Glenohumeral kinematics and capsulo-ligamentous strain resulting from laxity exams

Objective. Identification and quantification of strain in shoulder capsular-ligamentous structures during clinical exams and validation of this testing on cadavers. Methods. Mercury strain gauges were sutured in seven locations on shoulders from cadavers. An electromagnetic tracker quantified humera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2000-12, Vol.15 (10), p.735-742
Hauptverfasser: Brenneke, Stephen L., Reid, John, Ching, Randal P., Wheeler, Donna L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective. Identification and quantification of strain in shoulder capsular-ligamentous structures during clinical exams and validation of this testing on cadavers. Methods. Mercury strain gauges were sutured in seven locations on shoulders from cadavers. An electromagnetic tracker quantified humeral head translations during laxity exams. Strain and humeral position were acquired during performance of Sulcus, Feagin, Apprehension, Load and Shift, Drawer, and Hawkins tests. Results. Anterior humeral head translation in neutral position was primarily constrained by the coracohumeral ligament. With the arm abducted, anterior middle and inferior ligaments also became active. External rotation and abduction activated inferior and middle capsules. Posterior capsule constrained motion for posterior tests in neutral and abduction. Superior and inferior capsular ligaments were active during inferior tests in neutral position. With abduction, inferior ligaments provided primary translation constraint. Conclusion. Study of kinematics and strain evaluation on cadavers can yield useful information on mechanisms of glenohumeral instability. Relevance This study clarifies the contribution of specific structures of the shoulder to strain in the joint capsule. It also identifies which structures are challenged by provocative laxity exams commonly used by orthopaedic physicians.
ISSN:0268-0033
1879-1271
DOI:10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00041-3