Treatment of proximal hypospadias with a tubularized island flap urethroplasty and the onlay technique: A comparative study

Background/Purpose: The onlay island flap urethroplasty was first described in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias. Since then, this technique has been increasingly used in more severe cases of hypospadias, because of the complications of tubularized flaps, mainly megaurethra and proxima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2000-10, Vol.35 (10), p.1453-1455
Hauptverfasser: Castañón, M., Muñoz, E., Carrasco, R., Rodó, J., Morales, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Purpose: The onlay island flap urethroplasty was first described in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias. Since then, this technique has been increasingly used in more severe cases of hypospadias, because of the complications of tubularized flaps, mainly megaurethra and proximal anastomotic strictures. The aim of this study was to compare the morbidity of these 2 techniques. Methods: Between April 1994 and December 1998, 80 patients underwent surgical treatment for hypospadias. A tubularized island flap (Duckett technique) was performed in 42 cases, and the onlay island flap technique was used in 38 patients. The authors retrospectively compared the complication rate and type of these 2 procedures. Results: Altogether, fistula was the most frequent complication without any significant difference between the 2 groups (21.4% for Duckett technique and 18.4% for onlay repair; P >.05). However, the anastomotic stricture was much more common in the tubularized flap group (7.14% v 2.63%; P
ISSN:0022-3468
1531-5037
DOI:10.1053/jpsu.2000.16412