Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver masses: Diagnostic value and reproducibility of cytological criteria

There are many helpful cytological criteria for the diagnosis of liver fine‐needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs), but none of them are pathognomonic of primary or metastatic tumors. We analyzed the diagnostic value and reproducibility of 28 cytological parameters in FNABs from 140 hepatic masses, incl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2001-12, Vol.25 (6), p.365-375
Hauptverfasser: Granados, Rosario, Aramburu, Jose A., Murillo, Nieves, Camarmo, Encarnación, de la Cal, Miguel A., Fernandez-Segoviano, Pilar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are many helpful cytological criteria for the diagnosis of liver fine‐needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs), but none of them are pathognomonic of primary or metastatic tumors. We analyzed the diagnostic value and reproducibility of 28 cytological parameters in FNABs from 140 hepatic masses, including 29 benign lesions, 49 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 62 metastatic tumors, encompassing 48 adenocarcinomas (ACAs). Five different observers evaluated each sample, and the interobserver and intraobserver agreement was studied. Multivariable analysis showed that the criteria more closely associated with malignancy were irregular nuclear contour, three‐dimensional cell groups, and atypical naked nuclei. Capillaries separating tumor cells and granular cytoplasm were strongly associated with HCCs, while eccentrically placed nuclei and necrosis were most commonly seen in ACAs and in metastatic tumors. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was excellent for the final cytological diagnosis, and there was fair to very good interobserver agreement for 22 of the 28 criteria studied. Architectural features were less reproducible than pure cytological criteria. Intraobserver variability was not influenced by the years of experience in the field. A precise and strict definition of terminology rendered a better reproducibility of the cytological criteria. Diagn. Cytopathol. 25:365–375, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/dc.10025