Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstruct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, Roger P., Koduri, Sumana, Lobel, Robert W., Culligan, Patrick J., Tomezsko, Janet E., Winkler, Harvey A., Sand, Peter K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1313
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1307
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 185
creator Goldberg, Roger P.
Koduri, Sumana
Lobel, Robert W.
Culligan, Patrick J.
Tomezsko, Janet E.
Winkler, Harvey A.
Sand, Peter K.
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mob.2001.119080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72357223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937801211326</els_id><sourcerecordid>72357223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P7CAUhom5RsfR9d3dsLq7jkBpgaUxfiWT6ELXhNJTxXRKBTqJ_15qJ3HlCg553yecB6G_lGwoqcXlzjcbRgjdUKqIJEdoRYkSRS1r-QetCCGsUKWQp-gsxvd5ZIqdoFNKBeeK0BWKT8EnsMntAUPX5Rv2HY5TMwVIb8H0OPZueI3YD3j0MfkRgvlO2888WegBB7BTCDBYwKZLEOYHP8QUpoU7Qr93Fh-qfjhHx53pI1wczjV6ub15vr4vto93D9dX28KWvEyFkK01gleyJaqtQFJCpaQMZG1YWSqj8qam5arivGFQtWXdUMZBSJFrlPNyjf4v3DH4jwli0jsX8497M4CfohasrATLrDW6XII2-BgDdHoMbmfCp6ZEz5519qxnz3rxnBv_Duip2UH7kz-IzQG1BCAvuHcQdLRuVtS6bCfp1rtf4V8SDY6T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72357223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.119080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11744901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cystocele ; Female ; genuine stress incontinence ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; prolapse ; recurrence ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention ; suburethral sling ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery ; Urinary Incontinence - complications ; Urinary Incontinence - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures ; Uterine Prolapse - complications ; Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313</ispartof><rights>2001 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11744901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koduri, Sumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culligan, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Harvey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cystocele</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>genuine stress incontinence</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>prolapse</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>suburethral sling</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - complications</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1P7CAUhom5RsfR9d3dsLq7jkBpgaUxfiWT6ELXhNJTxXRKBTqJ_15qJ3HlCg553yecB6G_lGwoqcXlzjcbRgjdUKqIJEdoRYkSRS1r-QetCCGsUKWQp-gsxvd5ZIqdoFNKBeeK0BWKT8EnsMntAUPX5Rv2HY5TMwVIb8H0OPZueI3YD3j0MfkRgvlO2888WegBB7BTCDBYwKZLEOYHP8QUpoU7Qr93Fh-qfjhHx53pI1wczjV6ub15vr4vto93D9dX28KWvEyFkK01gleyJaqtQFJCpaQMZG1YWSqj8qam5arivGFQtWXdUMZBSJFrlPNyjf4v3DH4jwli0jsX8497M4CfohasrATLrDW6XII2-BgDdHoMbmfCp6ZEz5519qxnz3rxnBv_Duip2UH7kz-IzQG1BCAvuHcQdLRuVtS6bCfp1rtf4V8SDY6T</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Goldberg, Roger P.</creator><creator>Koduri, Sumana</creator><creator>Lobel, Robert W.</creator><creator>Culligan, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creator><creator>Winkler, Harvey A.</creator><creator>Sand, Peter K.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><author>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cystocele</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>genuine stress incontinence</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>prolapse</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>suburethral sling</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - complications</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koduri, Sumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culligan, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Harvey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldberg, Roger P.</au><au>Koduri, Sumana</au><au>Lobel, Robert W.</au><au>Culligan, Patrick J.</au><au>Tomezsko, Janet E.</au><au>Winkler, Harvey A.</au><au>Sand, Peter K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1313</epage><pages>1307-1313</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11744901</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2001.119080</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72357223
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cystocele
Female
genuine stress incontinence
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Humans
Middle Aged
prolapse
recurrence
Risk Factors
Secondary Prevention
suburethral sling
Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications
Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention & control
Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery
Urinary Incontinence - complications
Urinary Incontinence - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures
Uterine Prolapse - complications
Uterine Prolapse - surgery
title Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protective%20effect%20of%20suburethral%20slings%20on%20postoperative%20cystocele%20recurrence%20after%20reconstructive%20pelvic%20operation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Goldberg,%20Roger%20P.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1313&rft.pages=1307-1313&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2001.119080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72357223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72357223&rft_id=info:pmid/11744901&rft_els_id=S0002937801211326&rfr_iscdi=true