Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstruct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1307 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 185 |
creator | Goldberg, Roger P. Koduri, Sumana Lobel, Robert W. Culligan, Patrick J. Tomezsko, Janet E. Winkler, Harvey A. Sand, Peter K. |
description | Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mob.2001.119080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72357223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937801211326</els_id><sourcerecordid>72357223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P7CAUhom5RsfR9d3dsLq7jkBpgaUxfiWT6ELXhNJTxXRKBTqJ_15qJ3HlCg553yecB6G_lGwoqcXlzjcbRgjdUKqIJEdoRYkSRS1r-QetCCGsUKWQp-gsxvd5ZIqdoFNKBeeK0BWKT8EnsMntAUPX5Rv2HY5TMwVIb8H0OPZueI3YD3j0MfkRgvlO2888WegBB7BTCDBYwKZLEOYHP8QUpoU7Qr93Fh-qfjhHx53pI1wczjV6ub15vr4vto93D9dX28KWvEyFkK01gleyJaqtQFJCpaQMZG1YWSqj8qam5arivGFQtWXdUMZBSJFrlPNyjf4v3DH4jwli0jsX8497M4CfohasrATLrDW6XII2-BgDdHoMbmfCp6ZEz5519qxnz3rxnBv_Duip2UH7kz-IzQG1BCAvuHcQdLRuVtS6bCfp1rtf4V8SDY6T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72357223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.119080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11744901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cystocele ; Female ; genuine stress incontinence ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; prolapse ; recurrence ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention ; suburethral sling ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention & control ; Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery ; Urinary Incontinence - complications ; Urinary Incontinence - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures ; Uterine Prolapse - complications ; Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313</ispartof><rights>2001 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.119080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11744901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koduri, Sumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culligan, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Harvey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cystocele</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>genuine stress incontinence</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>prolapse</subject><subject>recurrence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary Prevention</subject><subject>suburethral sling</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - complications</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1P7CAUhom5RsfR9d3dsLq7jkBpgaUxfiWT6ELXhNJTxXRKBTqJ_15qJ3HlCg553yecB6G_lGwoqcXlzjcbRgjdUKqIJEdoRYkSRS1r-QetCCGsUKWQp-gsxvd5ZIqdoFNKBeeK0BWKT8EnsMntAUPX5Rv2HY5TMwVIb8H0OPZueI3YD3j0MfkRgvlO2888WegBB7BTCDBYwKZLEOYHP8QUpoU7Qr93Fh-qfjhHx53pI1wczjV6ub15vr4vto93D9dX28KWvEyFkK01gleyJaqtQFJCpaQMZG1YWSqj8qam5arivGFQtWXdUMZBSJFrlPNyjf4v3DH4jwli0jsX8497M4CfohasrATLrDW6XII2-BgDdHoMbmfCp6ZEz5519qxnz3rxnBv_Duip2UH7kz-IzQG1BCAvuHcQdLRuVtS6bCfp1rtf4V8SDY6T</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Goldberg, Roger P.</creator><creator>Koduri, Sumana</creator><creator>Lobel, Robert W.</creator><creator>Culligan, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creator><creator>Winkler, Harvey A.</creator><creator>Sand, Peter K.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</title><author>Goldberg, Roger P. ; Koduri, Sumana ; Lobel, Robert W. ; Culligan, Patrick J. ; Tomezsko, Janet E. ; Winkler, Harvey A. ; Sand, Peter K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-78dca7458d09d5e81018812e86a2339a9097ad49544b2e5d36b124e787ca71443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cystocele</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>genuine stress incontinence</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>prolapse</topic><topic>recurrence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary Prevention</topic><topic>suburethral sling</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - complications</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Roger P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koduri, Sumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culligan, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomezsko, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Harvey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sand, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldberg, Roger P.</au><au>Koduri, Sumana</au><au>Lobel, Robert W.</au><au>Culligan, Patrick J.</au><au>Tomezsko, Janet E.</au><au>Winkler, Harvey A.</au><au>Sand, Peter K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>185</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1313</epage><pages>1307-1313</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11744901</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2001.119080</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72357223 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cystocele Female genuine stress incontinence Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Middle Aged prolapse recurrence Risk Factors Secondary Prevention suburethral sling Urinary Bladder Diseases - complications Urinary Bladder Diseases - prevention & control Urinary Bladder Diseases - surgery Urinary Incontinence - complications Urinary Incontinence - surgery Urologic Surgical Procedures Uterine Prolapse - complications Uterine Prolapse - surgery |
title | Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protective%20effect%20of%20suburethral%20slings%20on%20postoperative%20cystocele%20recurrence%20after%20reconstructive%20pelvic%20operation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Goldberg,%20Roger%20P.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=185&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1313&rft.pages=1307-1313&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2001.119080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72357223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72357223&rft_id=info:pmid/11744901&rft_els_id=S0002937801211326&rfr_iscdi=true |