Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstruct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2001-12, Vol.185 (6), p.1307-1313
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, Roger P., Koduri, Sumana, Lobel, Robert W., Culligan, Patrick J., Tomezsko, Janet E., Winkler, Harvey A., Sand, Peter K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent effect of suburethral sling placement on the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation. Study Design: One hundred forty-eight women with cystoceles to or beyond the hymenal ring underwent pelvic reconstructive operation, with or without incontinence procedures, and were evaluated at 12 and 52 weeks after operation with a standardized pelvic examination. Rates of recurrent prolapse, at all sites, were statistically compared between subjects with and without suburethral slings. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the independent effect of sling placement on the risk of recurrent cystoceles. Results: Suburethral sling placement was associated with a 54.8% reduction in the mean rate of postoperative cystocele recurrence (P =.004). This protective effect was observed as early as 12 weeks and remained significant at 1-year follow up (42% vs 19%). A markedly reduced risk of cystocele recurrence was observed when women with sling procedures were compared with all other women, with those women who underwent other incontinence operations, and even with those women who had undergone prolapse repair with no incontinence procedure. The protective effect of the sling procedure remained highly significant (odds ratio, 0.29; P =.0003), even after controlling for potentially confounding variables in a multiple logistic regression model. Conclusion: Suburethral sling procedures appear to significantly reduce the risk of cystocele recurrence after pelvic reconstructive operation, in contrast with the effect of retropubic urethropexy and needle suspensions. These findings should be considered when the surgical treatment of stress incontinence that accompanies pelvic organ prolapse is being planned. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1307–13.)
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1067/mob.2001.119080