Novel Translational Model for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Study: Accrual to a Presurgical Intervention with Tamoxifen and N-[4-Hydroxyphenyl] Retinamide
Surrogate end point biomarkers for risk assessment and efficacy of potential chemopreventive agents are needed to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of chemoprevention trials. It is imperative to develop the best clinical breast model for translational surrogate end point biomarker studies,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2000-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1087-1090 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Surrogate end point biomarkers for risk assessment and efficacy of
potential chemopreventive agents are needed to improve the efficiency
and reduce the cost of chemoprevention trials. It is imperative to
develop the best clinical breast model for translational surrogate
end point biomarker studies, especially with respect to accrual
feasibility. We have initiated a prospective study to develop
biomarkers for tamoxifen and N -[4-hydroxyphenyl]
retinamide by administering either a placebo or both drugs for 2–4
weeks to women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early
invasive cancers in the interval between the initial diagnostic core
biopsy and definitive surgery. The principle end point is pretreatment
versus posttreatment tumor levels of Ki-67; a number of
other exploratory markers will also be examined. The planned target
sample size is 100 patients. Between February 1997 and February 2000,
4514 women who had either an abnormal mammogram or a diagnosed breast
cancer were screened for the study. Of these 4514 screened patients, 52
(1%) were registered on the study. Major factors of nonparticipation
in the remaining 4462 women were as follows: ( a ) no
evidence of malignancy (2081 patients; 46%); ( b )
ineligible per protocol criteria (575 patients; 13%);
( c ) preoperative chemotherapy/tamoxifen (520 patients;
11%); ( d ) surgery scheduling conflict (360 patients;
8%); ( e ) outside needle biopsy (221 patients; 5%);
( f ) no residual disease after excisional biopsy (345
patients; 8%); and ( g ) second opinion only (123
patients; 3%). Other nonparticipation factors included fine needle
aspiration only, refusal, tumor size > 2 cm, and estrogen
replacement therapy (35 patients each; 2% each). The protocol was
amended in midstudy to allow outside needle biopsy, tumor > 2 cm,
and estrogen replacement therapy. Accrual to biomarker (nontherapeutic)
protocols with delay in definitive cancer surgery is challenging but
feasible. Although some accrual problems remain, we have nonetheless
succeeded in recruiting 50% of our target sample size in a 3-year
period. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-9965 1538-7755 |