Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Colorectal Cancer in the General Population
CONTEXT A recent expert panel recommended that persons at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) begin screening for CRC at age 50 years using 1 of several strategies. However, many aspects of different CRC screening strategies remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the consequences, costs, and cost...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2000-10, Vol.284 (15), p.1954-1961 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT A recent expert panel recommended that persons at average risk of colorectal
cancer (CRC) begin screening for CRC at age 50 years using 1 of several strategies.
However, many aspects of different CRC screening strategies remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the consequences, costs, and cost-effectiveness of CRC screening
in average-risk individuals. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective using a Markov
model. SUBJECTS Hypothetical subjects representative of the 50-year-old US population
at average risk for CRC. SETTING Simulated clinical practice in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Discounted lifetime costs, life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness
(CE) ratio, compared used 22 different CRC screening strategies, including
those recommended by the expert panel. RESULTS In 1 base-case analysis, compliance was assumed to be 60% with the initial
screen and 80% with follow-up or surveillance colonoscopy. The most effective
strategy for white men was annual rehydrated fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)
plus sigmoidoscopy (followed by colonoscopy if either a low- or high-risk
polyp was found) every 5 years from age 50 to 85 years, which resulted in
a 60% reduction in cancer incidence and an 80% reduction in CRC mortality
compared with no screening, and an incremental CE ratio of $92,900 per year
of life gained compared with annual unrehydrated FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every
5 years. In a base-case analysis in which compliance with screening and follow-up
is assumed to be 100%, screening more often than every 10 years was prohibitively
expensive; annual rehydrated FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years had an
incremental CE ratio of $489,900 per life-year gained compared with the same
strategy every 10 years. Other strategies recommended by the expert panel
were either less effective or cost more per year of life gained than the alternatives.
Colonoscopy every 10 years was less effective than the combination of annual
FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years. However, a single colonoscopy at age
55 years achieves nearly half of the reduction in CRC mortality obtainable
with colonoscopy every 10 years. Because of increased life expectancy among
white women and increased cancer mortality among blacks, CRC screening was
even more cost-effective in these groups than in white men. CONCLUSIONS Screening for CRC, even in the setting of imperfect compliance, significantly
reduces CRC mortality at costs comparable to other canc |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.284.15.1954 |