Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion
In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand be...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian journal of physiotherapy 2001, Vol.47 (4), p.289-294 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 294 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 289 |
| container_title | Australian journal of physiotherapy |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Hayes, Kimberley Walton, Judie R Szomor, Zoltan L Murrell, George AC |
| description | In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53–0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56–0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72303712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0004951414602749</els_id><sourcerecordid>72303712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-430057d62ee0d2ba259af88f77767be7754aff1afe2b56744b2754dd8cc149cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cNqkiab5iRafEFB8HEO2WTSRnY3muwW-u_dPtCjMDDM8M0M8yF0SvAVwaS4fsMYs1xywi4IuywwFX21h4aEMZlTzOU-Gv4iA3SU0ifGRBaSHaIBIYJSKvkQ3b1C5XXpK9-usuAy55eQ1dAugk2ZCzHTKUFKvplnaRG6ykLMom7msIbr0PrQHKMDp6sEJ7s8Qh8P9-_Tp3z28vg8vZ3lhtOizdkYYy5sQQGwpaWmXGo3mTghRCFKEIIz7RzRDmjJC8FYSfuWtRNjCJOmHI_Q-XbvVwzfHaRW1T4ZqCrdQOiSEnSMx4LQHuRb0MSQUgSnvqKvdVwpgtVantrIU2szqo-NPCX7ubPdga6swf5N7Wz1wM0WgP7NpYeokvHQGLA-gmmVDf6fEz-GfX6F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72303712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R ; Szomor, Zoltan L ; Murrell, George AC</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R ; Szomor, Zoltan L ; Murrell, George AC</creatorcontrib><description>In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53–0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56–0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-9514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1449-2059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11722295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Protocols ; Confidence Intervals ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Photography ; Posture ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reproducibility of Results ; Shoulder ; Shoulder - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of physiotherapy, 2001, Vol.47 (4), p.289-294</ispartof><rights>2001 Australian Physiotherapy Association</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-430057d62ee0d2ba259af88f77767be7754aff1afe2b56744b2754dd8cc149cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-430057d62ee0d2ba259af88f77767be7754aff1afe2b56744b2754dd8cc149cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11722295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Judie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szomor, Zoltan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, George AC</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion</title><title>Australian journal of physiotherapy</title><addtitle>Aust J Physiother</addtitle><description>In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53–0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56–0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><issn>0004-9514</issn><issn>1449-2059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cNqkiab5iRafEFB8HEO2WTSRnY3muwW-u_dPtCjMDDM8M0M8yF0SvAVwaS4fsMYs1xywi4IuywwFX21h4aEMZlTzOU-Gv4iA3SU0ifGRBaSHaIBIYJSKvkQ3b1C5XXpK9-usuAy55eQ1dAugk2ZCzHTKUFKvplnaRG6ykLMom7msIbr0PrQHKMDp6sEJ7s8Qh8P9-_Tp3z28vg8vZ3lhtOizdkYYy5sQQGwpaWmXGo3mTghRCFKEIIz7RzRDmjJC8FYSfuWtRNjCJOmHI_Q-XbvVwzfHaRW1T4ZqCrdQOiSEnSMx4LQHuRb0MSQUgSnvqKvdVwpgtVantrIU2szqo-NPCX7ubPdga6swf5N7Wz1wM0WgP7NpYeokvHQGLA-gmmVDf6fEz-GfX6F</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Hayes, Kimberley</creator><creator>Walton, Judie R</creator><creator>Szomor, Zoltan L</creator><creator>Murrell, George AC</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion</title><author>Hayes, Kimberley ; Walton, Judie R ; Szomor, Zoltan L ; Murrell, George AC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-430057d62ee0d2ba259af88f77767be7754aff1afe2b56744b2754dd8cc149cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kimberley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walton, Judie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szomor, Zoltan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, George AC</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayes, Kimberley</au><au>Walton, Judie R</au><au>Szomor, Zoltan L</au><au>Murrell, George AC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of physiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Physiother</addtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>289-294</pages><issn>0004-9514</issn><eissn>1449-2059</eissn><abstract>In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53–0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56–0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial).</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>11722295</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0004-9514 |
| ispartof | Australian journal of physiotherapy, 2001, Vol.47 (4), p.289-294 |
| issn | 0004-9514 1449-2059 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72303712 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Aged Clinical Protocols Confidence Intervals Female Humans Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Photography Posture Range of Motion, Articular Reproducibility of Results Shoulder Shoulder - physiopathology Shoulder Joint - physiopathology |
| title | Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20five%20methods%20for%20assessing%20shoulder%20range%20of%20motion&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20physiotherapy&rft.au=Hayes,%20Kimberley&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=289-294&rft.issn=0004-9514&rft.eissn=1449-2059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72303712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72303712&rft_id=info:pmid/11722295&rft_els_id=S0004951414602749&rfr_iscdi=true |