Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion

In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of physiotherapy 2001, Vol.47 (4), p.289-294
Hauptverfasser: Hayes, Kimberley, Walton, Judie R, Szomor, Zoltan L, Murrell, George AC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, “stand and reach” and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53–0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56–0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial).
ISSN:0004-9514
1449-2059
DOI:10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60274-9