Biopsychosocial Screening Questionnaire for Patients With Low Back Pain: Preliminary Report of Utility in Physiotherapy Practice in Northern Ireland
OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility of a new biopsychosocial screening questionnaire (Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire) by exploring the relation between it and several physical risk factors and post-treatment outcomes so as to establish a cutoff point...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Clinical journal of pain 2000-09, Vol.16 (3), p.214-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to investigate the potential utility of a new biopsychosocial screening questionnaire (Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire) by exploring the relation between it and several physical risk factors and post-treatment outcomes so as to establish a cutoff point for the local population. The relation between the screening questionnaire and valid and reliable outcome measures of pain and functional disability was also explored.
DESIGN:Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were conducted on patients referred for physiotherapy for low back pain to a large Healthcare Trust in Northern Ireland. Before initial assessment, patients completed the screening questionnaire and outcome measures, were questioned about known physical risk factors, and then received physiotherapy. At final discharge, the outcome variables-the "number of treatments" and patient's current work status ("return to work [yes/no]")-were recorded, and patients recompleted the outcome measures.
PATIENTS:One hundred eighteen patients gave written informed consent to participate in this study.
RESULTS:Significant associations were detected between questionnaire scores and pretreatment "leisure time exercise," "analgesic medication use," and "subjective anesthesia"; posttreatment "return to work"; and "number of physiotherapy treatments" as well as pain and functional disability measures. A cutoff "at-risk" score of 112 was calculated, which correctly classified 74% of patients who received more than six treatments and 80% of patients who failed to return to work at the end of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:The findings of this study provide preliminary evidence of the utility of this biopsychosocial screening questionnaire for future use in clinical intervention studies in the Northern Ireland National Health Service. Further comparative investigations in other health care settings are warranted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-8047 1536-5409 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00002508-200009000-00007 |