Effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy on mammographic density

Objectives: to evaluate the effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Methods: In a prospective 1-year study, 121 healthy postmenopausal women were allocated to one of the following five study groups: twenty-six women were treate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maturitas 2001-11, Vol.40 (2), p.159-164
Hauptverfasser: Colacurci, Nicola, Fornaro, Felice, De Franciscis, Pasquale, Palermo, Mario, del Vecchio, Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: to evaluate the effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Methods: In a prospective 1-year study, 121 healthy postmenopausal women were allocated to one of the following five study groups: twenty-six women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die plus acetate nomegestrolo 5 mg/die sequentially added for 12 days per month (Group A); 25 women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die plus acetate nomegestrolo 2.5 mg/die added every day (Group B); 23 women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die (Group C); 24 women were treated with tibolone 2.5 mg/die (Group D); and 23 women not receiving any medication represented the control group (Group E). At the time of recruitment and after 12 months a two-view mammography was performed to evaluate mammographic density according to a quantitative method: type 1 (less than 25% of mammary gland covered by dense tissue), type 2 (from 25 to 75% of total glandular area covered by dense tissue), type 3 (more than 75% of mammary parenchyma covered by dense tissue). Results: After 12 months of HRT, seven out of 20 patients (35%) in group A, nine of 21 patients (42.85%) in group B, four out of 19 patients (21%) in group C and two of 20 patients (10%) in group D, showed an increase in mammographic density. No variation of density was observed at the second mammographic test in the control group. The mammographic density increase which occurred in groups A, B and C was statistically significant ( P
ISSN:0378-5122
1873-4111
DOI:10.1016/S0378-5122(01)00232-8