Gonorrhoea screening in general practice: perceived barriers and strategies to improve screening rates

Objective To investigate perceived barriers to gonorrhoea screening in general practice and suggest strategies to overcome them. Design Questionnaire‐based survey. Setting and participants All 47 general practitioners (GPs) authorised to prescribe subsidised HIV drugs under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in inner, eastern and northern Sydney. Main outcome measures Agreement on a five‐point Likert scale with statements about attitudes and practices in relation to gonorrhoea screening of homosexually active men, and views on how testing rates could be increased. Results 32 GPs responded (68%). Perceived barriers to gonorrhoea testing included structural measures imposed by the Federal Government to limit pathology testing by GPs (the Medicare “three‐test rule”) (17 respondents agreed or strongly agreed), pressure from the Health Insurance Commission (HIC) to minimise pathology testing (15), concerns about confidentiality of notification procedures (8), clinical time pressure (8), and concerns about recriminations against HIV patients with gonorrhoea (6). Suggested measures to increase testing were education of gay men to request testing (25), relaxation of the three‐test rule (25), easier tests (23), anonymous notification procedures, review of HIC policy on screening, and training about testing (21 each). Conclusions Sydney GPs with high HIV caseloads perceived structural barriers to gonorrhoea testing and supported a range of achievable strategies to overcome these. As the sustained epidemic of gonorrhoea in Sydney may be directly promoting HIV transmission, these strategies should be considered urgently.