Biochemical Outcome Following External Beam Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen Suppression Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT Combined treatment using radiation therapy (RT) and androgen suppression therapy (AST) is used to treat men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, but outcome using this combined therapy compared with RT alone is not known. OBJECTIVE To determine the relative efficacy of R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2000-09, Vol.284 (10), p.1280-1283
Hauptverfasser: D'Amico, Anthony V, Schultz, Delray, Loffredo, Marian, Dugal, Raymond, Hurwitz, Mark, Kaplan, Irving, Beard, Clair J, Renshaw, Andrew A, Kantoff, Philip W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:CONTEXT Combined treatment using radiation therapy (RT) and androgen suppression therapy (AST) is used to treat men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, but outcome using this combined therapy compared with RT alone is not known. OBJECTIVE To determine the relative efficacy of RT plus AST vs RT alone among men with clinically localized prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Retrospective cohort study of 1586 men with prostate cancer who were treated between January 1989 and August 1999 using 3-dimensional conformal RT with (n = 276) or without (n = 1310) 6 months of AST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Relative risk (RR) of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus statement), by treatment and high-, intermediate-, or low-risk group based on serum PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer clinical tumor category. RESULTS Estimates of 5-year PSA outcome after RT with or without AST were not statistically different among low-risk patients (P = .09), whereas intermediate- and high-risk patients treated with RT plus AST had significantly better outcomes than those treated with RT alone (P
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.284.10.1280