Comment on the Validity of the MCMI-III

Comments on the article by R. Rogers, R. T. Salekin, and K. W. Sewell (see record 1999-03608-003) which addressed the validity of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III). The major validity study for the most recent version of the test was not included in Rogers et al's literature r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Law and human behavior 2000-08, Vol.24 (4), p.499-500
1. Verfasser:	Retzlaff, Paul D
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adversarial Forum Computer systems Diagnosis Disorders Forensic Psychiatry - methods Humans Legal Decisions Legal Processes Legal Testimony Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Personality Disorders Personality Inventory Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Test Forms Test Validity United States Validity
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Comments on the article by R. Rogers, R. T. Salekin, and K. W. Sewell (see record 1999-03608-003) which addressed the validity of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III). The major validity study for the most recent version of the test was not included in Rogers et al's literature review or analysis. As such, the current author states that conclusions reached by Rogers et al regarding the validity of the MCMI-III leave the readership with a misunderstanding of the test. Other methodological issues are also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
ISSN:	0147-7307 1573-661X
DOI:	10.1023/A:1005552631950