Anthropometry of the trunk and extremities in nutritional assessment of children with chronic renal failure

Objective: Comparison of anthropometric parameters of the trunk and extremities between 2 groups of children with chronic renal failure (CRF) with different levels of nutritional status and healthy controls. Design: A prospective cross-sectional study. Settings: Department of Physiology and Anthropo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of renal nutrition 2002-10, Vol.12 (4), p.238-243
Hauptverfasser: Todorovska, Lidija, Sahpasova, Emilija, Todorovski, Danijel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Comparison of anthropometric parameters of the trunk and extremities between 2 groups of children with chronic renal failure (CRF) with different levels of nutritional status and healthy controls. Design: A prospective cross-sectional study. Settings: Department of Physiology and Anthropology, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje. Patients: Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 10.5 ± 3.2 years (10 boys and 11 girls) with mild to moderate CRF were divided into well-nourished (chronic renal failure children [CRFC] I) and undernourished (CRFC II) children according to their nutritional status. The control group was 22 healthy children with a mean age of 10.7 ± 3.8 years (10 boys and 12 girls). Nutritional status of the children was assessed by comparing anthropometric parameters with National Center for Health Statistics references. Interventions: Anthropometry. Main Outcome Measurements: Body weight, height, sitting height, arm and leg length, knee height, chest circumference, midarm circumference, triceps skin-fold thickness, and upper arm muscle and fat area. Results: Mean sitting height, leg length, and chest circumference were significantly lower in both the CRFC I group (67.8 ± 3.5, 57.5 ± 4.2, and 53.0 ± 3.9 cm) and the CRFC II group (65.6 ± 2.2, 56.1 ± 4.1, and 50.6 ± 2.7 cm) compared with the healthy controls (72.5 ± 2.9, 61.3 ± 3.5, and 62.4 ± 4.1 cm, respectively). The highest significant correlations to height were for sitting height (r = +0.82, P
ISSN:1051-2276
1532-8503
DOI:10.1053/jren.2002.35315