Anthropometry of the trunk and extremities in nutritional assessment of children with chronic renal failure
Objective: Comparison of anthropometric parameters of the trunk and extremities between 2 groups of children with chronic renal failure (CRF) with different levels of nutritional status and healthy controls. Design: A prospective cross-sectional study. Settings: Department of Physiology and Anthropo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of renal nutrition 2002-10, Vol.12 (4), p.238-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Comparison of anthropometric parameters of the trunk and extremities between 2 groups of children with chronic renal failure (CRF) with different levels of nutritional status and healthy controls. Design: A prospective cross-sectional study. Settings: Department of Physiology and Anthropology, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje. Patients: Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 10.5 ± 3.2 years (10 boys and 11 girls) with mild to moderate CRF were divided into well-nourished (chronic renal failure children [CRFC] I) and undernourished (CRFC II) children according to their nutritional status. The control group was 22 healthy children with a mean age of 10.7 ± 3.8 years (10 boys and 12 girls). Nutritional status of the children was assessed by comparing anthropometric parameters with National Center for Health Statistics references. Interventions: Anthropometry. Main Outcome Measurements: Body weight, height, sitting height, arm and leg length, knee height, chest circumference, midarm circumference, triceps skin-fold thickness, and upper arm muscle and fat area. Results: Mean sitting height, leg length, and chest circumference were significantly lower in both the CRFC I group (67.8 ± 3.5, 57.5 ± 4.2, and 53.0 ± 3.9 cm) and the CRFC II group (65.6 ± 2.2, 56.1 ± 4.1, and 50.6 ± 2.7 cm) compared with the healthy controls (72.5 ± 2.9, 61.3 ± 3.5, and 62.4 ± 4.1 cm, respectively). The highest significant correlations to height were for sitting height (r = +0.82, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-2276 1532-8503 |
DOI: | 10.1053/jren.2002.35315 |