The anatomical substrate for cat extraocular muscle proprioception
The localization of cell bodies and of the central terminal projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons was examined in adult cats using transport of horseradish peroxidase. The results confirm that primary afferent cell somata subserving extraocular muscle proprioception are located within t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience 1991, Vol.43 (2), p.473-481 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The localization of cell bodies and of the central terminal projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons was examined in adult cats using transport of horseradish peroxidase. The results confirm that primary afferent cell somata subserving extraocular muscle proprioception are located within the medial portion of the ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion. Occasional labeling of cell bodies in the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve occurred only in association with evidence of spread of tracer beyond the eye muscles. These results, taken together with work of others, make it unlikely that the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus participates significantly in eye muscle proprioception.
The central projections of extraocular muscle afferent neurons were found consistently in a restricted area in the ventral portion of the pars interpolaris of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. This corresponds exactly with their site of termination in the monkey [
Porter (1986)
J. comp. Neurol.
247, 133–143]. Terminal labeling was restricted to this area in cases in which there was no evidence of spread of the tracer beyond the extraocular muscles. In contrast to previous findings in the monkey, the cat did not exhibit a second muscle afferent representation in the cuneate nucleus. Though it is known that extraocular muscle afferent signals interact with both retinal and vestibular signals, and thus probably are involved in both visual processing and oculomotor control, the details of their roles in these processes are not yet clear.
Consideration of the species differences between cat and monkey which the present results have identified may prove helpful in the further investigation of the relative contributions to the visual and the oculomotor systems of afferent signals from the extraocular muscles (inflow) on the one hand and of copies of motor commands (outflow) on the other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-4522 1873-7544 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90309-C |