Long-Range Synchronization of gamma and beta Oscillations and the Plasticity of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses: A Network Model
1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203; and 2 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom Bibbig, Andrea, Roger D. Traub, and Miles A. Whittington. Long-Range Synchronization...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2002-10, Vol.88 (4), p.1634-1654 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology,
State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York
11203; and 2 School of Biomedical Sciences,
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom
Bibbig, Andrea,
Roger D. Traub, and
Miles
A. Whittington.
Long-Range Synchronization of and Oscillations and the
Plasticity of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses: A Network
Model. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1634-1654, 2002. The ability of oscillating networks to synchronize
despite significant separation in space, and thus time, is of
biological significance, given that human activity can synchronize
over distances of several millimeters to centimeters during perceptual and learning tasks. We use computer simulations of networks consisting of excitatory pyramidal cells (e-cells) and inhibitory interneurons (i-cells), modeling two tonically driven assemblies separated by large
( 8 ms) conduction delays. The results are as follows. 1 )
Two assemblies separated by large conduction delays can fire synchronously at frequency (with i-cells firing at frequency) under two timing conditions: e-cells of (say) assembly 2 are still inhibited "delay + spike generation milliseconds" after the e-cell beat of assembly 1; this means that the e-cell inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) cannot be significantly shorter than the delay (2-site
effect). This implies for a given decay time constant that the
interneuron pyramidal cell conductances must be large enough. The
e-cell IPSP must last longer than the i-cell IPSP, i.e., the
interneuron pyramidal cell conductance must be sufficiently large
and the interneuron interneuron conductance sufficiently small
(local effect). 2 ) We define a " long-interval
doublet" as a pair of interneuron action potentials separated
by approximately "delay milliseconds" in which a ) the
first spike is induced by tonic inputs and/or excitation from nearby
e-cells, while b ) the second spike is induced by (delayed)
excitation from distant e-cells. "Long-interval population
doublets" (long-interval doublets of the i-cell population) are
necessary for synchronized firing in our networks. Failure to produce
them leads to almost anti-phase activity at frequency.
3 ) An (almost) anti-phase oscillation is the most stable
oscillation pattern of two assemblies that are separated by axonal
conduction delays of approximately one-half a period (delays from 8 to 17 ms in our simulations) and that are firing at frequency.
4 ) Two assemblies |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.1634 |