The ninety-fifth percentile for growth discordance predicts complications of twin pregnancy

Objective: Our purpose was to define twin growth discordance on the basis of perinatal outcome. Study Design: Twins delivered at >23 weeks' gestation between 1995 and 2000 were identified by use of our computerized perinatal database. Birth weight (BW), chorionicity, and the following outcom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2002-09, Vol.187 (3), p.667-671
Hauptverfasser: Redman, Mark E., Blackwell, Sean C., Refuerzo, Jerrie S., Kruger, Michael, Naccasha, Nihal, Hassan, Sonia S., Berry, Stanley M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Our purpose was to define twin growth discordance on the basis of perinatal outcome. Study Design: Twins delivered at >23 weeks' gestation between 1995 and 2000 were identified by use of our computerized perinatal database. Birth weight (BW), chorionicity, and the following outcomes were recorded: cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS), umbilical artery (UA) pH, 5-minute Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and stillbirth. Discordance was calculated as 100 ×(Larger BW − Smaller BW)/Larger BW. The distribution of discordance values for the study population was determined. Outcomes were compared for twins with and without discordance at thresholds defined by population percentile. Results: The mean discordance for 346 twins was 11.4% ± 10.5%. The 75th percentile was 16% discordance, the 90th was 23%, and the 95th was 31%. Discordance was independently associated with outcomes. The 95th percentile was the threshold most predictive of cesarean section NRFS, UA pH
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1067/mob.2002.125745