Dyspnea, respiratory function and sputum profile in asthmatic patients during exacerbations

Dyspnea is often used as a marker of asthma severity although a wide variation in dyspnea perception associated with bronchoconstriction (PB) has been described in asthmatic patients. Our hypothesis is that changes of airway inflammation, airway narrowing and hyperinflation may account for a part of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2002-09, Vol.96 (9), p.745-750
Hauptverfasser: ROSI, E., LANINI, B., RONCHI, M.C., ROMAGNOLI, I., STENDARDI, L., BIANCHI, R., ZONEFRATI, R., DURANTI, R., SCANO, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dyspnea is often used as a marker of asthma severity although a wide variation in dyspnea perception associated with bronchoconstriction (PB) has been described in asthmatic patients. Our hypothesis is that changes of airway inflammation, airway narrowing and hyperinflation may account for a part of the variability of breathlessness in spontaneous asthma attack. In asthmatic patients with exacerbation of the disease, we evaluated respiratory function, dyspnea (using visual Analogue Scale—VAS) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values and variability (amplitude % mean), and sputum cellular and biochemical profile before (day I) and after (day II) therapy with i.v. corticosteroids and inhaled β 2 -agonists, as appropriate. By day II, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1), inspiratory capacity (IC), PEF or VAS values and variability, sputum eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) had improved. Improvement of dyspnea expressed as a decrease in VAS and reduction in variability of dyspnea sensation significantly correlated with increase in FEV 1 %predicted value (%pv) ( P=0.03; ρ=0.72 and P =0.02; ρ=0.74, respectively). No significant correlation was found between IC and VAS either in absolute values or as changes from days I and II, nor between sputum outcomes and PEF or VAS, regardless of how they were measured. We conclude that in acute asthmatic patients, dyspnea measurement, functional measurements and sputum analysis may be useful in monitoring disease activity, response to therapy and can provide different information on the state of the disease.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1053/rmed.2002.1343