Effect of administration mode (patient vs physician) and patient's educational level on the Turkish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) when administered by the physician to when self‐administered by the patient. The effect of the patient's educational level on the IPSS was also evaluated. Methods: One hundred and seven previously untreated patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) completed the Turkish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score (Turkish I‐PSS) and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires during a single office visit, first on their own and then with an interviewing physician. The patients were categorized into three groups according to their educational levels. Paired t‐tests were performed to compare the total IPSS (tIPSS) and QOL results between the two testing modes. IPSS and QOL scores resulting from both modes were compared using a kappa test. Differences between the physician‐assisted and self‐administered scores among the different educational groups were further compared using a one‐way anova test and Post Hoc Multiple Comparisons. To compare the objective effectiveness of tIPSS and QOL between the two testing modes, we selected the positive actual state, which was maximum urine flow (Qmax) of 15 mL/s or less and constructed receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for all patients. This estimation was constructed for each educational level. Results: There were no statistical differences in IPSS and QOL values obtained by the patients or physicians (P > 0.05). The ROC areas for tIPSS were 0.94 and 0.93, and the ROC areas for QOL scores were 0.97 and 0.91 for information obtained by physicians and patients, respectively. When IPSS answers and QOL scores were evaluated separately, consistency was found across both modes of administration. However, there were lower levels of consistency in answers to IPSS questions 2, 5 and 6 (P = 0.59;0.42; 0.52, respectively). There was no significant difference among the aforementioned data in the educational groups. Conclusion: Although the total IPSS and QOL scores were not affected by the different modes of administration, we recommend that the physicians should evaluate answers to questions 2, 5 and 6 carefully. The present study demonstrates that the educational level did not affect the IPSS and QOL when administered either by the physician or the patient.