Induction to delivery time interval in patients with and without preeclampsia: a retrospective analysis
Background. Anecdotally, it is suggested that patients with preeclampsia have a shorter induction to delivery interval than patients without preeclampsia, despite there being no good objective evidence. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 136 primiparous, singleton, cephalic, nonassisted vaginal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2002-09, Vol.81 (9), p.867-869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background. Anecdotally, it is suggested that patients with preeclampsia have a shorter induction to delivery interval than patients without preeclampsia, despite there being no good objective evidence.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of 136 primiparous, singleton, cephalic, nonassisted vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and January 2000. Sixty‐eight women had induction of labor for preeclampsia and 68 women without preeclampsia had induction of labor for other reasons. The two groups were already case‐matched for maternal and gestational age. The following details were recorded from the case notes: maternal age, gestation at delivery, initial Bishop score, total dose of prostaglandin administered, induction to delivery interval, duration of second‐stage labor, birthweight, and the percentage of Apgar scores |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810912.x |