Induction to delivery time interval in patients with and without preeclampsia: a retrospective analysis

Background.  Anecdotally, it is suggested that patients with preeclampsia have a shorter induction to delivery interval than patients without preeclampsia, despite there being no good objective evidence. Methods.  A retrospective analysis of 136 primiparous, singleton, cephalic, nonassisted vaginal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2002-09, Vol.81 (9), p.867-869
Hauptverfasser: Griffiths, Anthony N., Hikary, Nadia, Sizer, Andrew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background.  Anecdotally, it is suggested that patients with preeclampsia have a shorter induction to delivery interval than patients without preeclampsia, despite there being no good objective evidence. Methods.  A retrospective analysis of 136 primiparous, singleton, cephalic, nonassisted vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and January 2000. Sixty‐eight women had induction of labor for preeclampsia and 68 women without preeclampsia had induction of labor for other reasons. The two groups were already case‐matched for maternal and gestational age. The following details were recorded from the case notes: maternal age, gestation at delivery, initial Bishop score, total dose of prostaglandin administered, induction to delivery interval, duration of second‐stage labor, birthweight, and the percentage of Apgar scores
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810912.x