Effects of valve dysfunction on Doppler Tei index

Background: Recently proposed Doppler Tei index, defined as the sum of isovolumic contraction time or mitral valve closure to aortic valve opening time and isovolumic relaxation time or aortic valve closure to mitral valve opening time divided by ejection time, is a simple measure which enables noni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2002-09, Vol.15 (9), p.877-883
Hauptverfasser: Haque, Amdadul, Otsuji, Yutaka, Yoshifuku, Shiro, Kumanohoso, Toshiro, Zhang, Hui, Kisanuki, Akira, Minagoe, Shinichi, Sakata, Ryuzo, Tei, Chuwa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Recently proposed Doppler Tei index, defined as the sum of isovolumic contraction time or mitral valve closure to aortic valve opening time and isovolumic relaxation time or aortic valve closure to mitral valve opening time divided by ejection time, is a simple measure which enables noninvasive estimation of combined systolic and diastolic function and prediction of patients' prognosis. However, effects of valve dysfunction on Tei index have not been investigated. This study was designed to compare Tei index before and after surgical valve replacement or repair to evaluate effects of valve dysfunction on Tei index. Methods: Participants consisted of 76 consecutive patients with aortic or mitral valve surgery (26 patients with aortic stenosis [AS], 16 with aortic regurgitation, 17 with mitral stenosis, and 17 with mitral regurgitation). Doppler Tei index was evaluated before and after the surgery by obtaining (a−b)/b, where a is the interval between the cessation and onset of Doppler mitral filling flow and b is the aortic flow ejection time. Results: Tei index significantly increased after surgery in patients with AS (0.38 ± 0.07 to 0.49 ± 0.06, P
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1067/mje.2002.121198