Angiogenesis induction and regression in human surgical wounds

Angiogenesis in human wound healing is not well characterized, with only sparse information available regarding the maturation and fate of vessels formed as a consequence of human tissue repair. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the temporal profile of angiogenesis in human dermal wounds. Pun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wound repair and regeneration 2002-07, Vol.10 (4), p.245-251
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Nicola J., Smyth, Edward A. E., Cross, Simon S., Reed, Malcolm W. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Angiogenesis in human wound healing is not well characterized, with only sparse information available regarding the maturation and fate of vessels formed as a consequence of human tissue repair. Therefore, this study aimed to establish the temporal profile of angiogenesis in human dermal wounds. Punch biopsies were obtained under local anesthesia from 45 patients following breast surgery. Scars were predominantly between 2 and 52 weeks after surgery but in five patients were > 52 weeks. Control samples were taken from breast skin peroperatively (n=24). Quantification of vascular density was performed using the Chalkley grid, following antibody staining for platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule. Vascular patterns, wound cellularity and morphology were also determined. Cumulative microvessel density was increased in all samples when compared to controls (p  52 weeks. Control tissue showed an ordered morphological arrangement of dermal structures, collagen, and elastic fibers. However, wounding resulted in marked structural distortion for up to 15 weeks. In conclusion, this study shows for the first time the prolonged persistence of both microvessels and cellularity (fibroblastic cells), in addition to structural distortion in human dermal wounds, which is in contrast to previous in vitro and in vivo studies. (WOUND REP REG 2002;10:245–251)
ISSN:1067-1927
1524-475X
DOI:10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10408.x