Insights into the specificity of RNA cleavage by the Escherichia coli MazF toxin

The mazEF ( chpA) toxin–antitoxin system of Escherichia coli is involved in the cell response to nutritional and antibiotic stresses as well as in bacterial-programmed cell death. Valuable information on the MazF toxin was derived from the determination of the crystal structure of the MazE/MazF comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:FEBS letters 2004-06, Vol.567 (2), p.316-320
Hauptverfasser: Muñoz-Gómez, Ana J., Santos-Sierra, Sandra, Berzal-Herranz, Alfredo, Lemonnier, Marc, Dı́az-Orejas, Ramón
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The mazEF ( chpA) toxin–antitoxin system of Escherichia coli is involved in the cell response to nutritional and antibiotic stresses as well as in bacterial-programmed cell death. Valuable information on the MazF toxin was derived from the determination of the crystal structure of the MazE/MazF complex and from in vivo data, suggesting that MazF promoted ribosome-dependent cleavage of messenger RNA. However, it was concluded from recent in vitro analyses using a MazF-(His6) fusion protein that MazF was an endoribonuclease that cleaved messenger RNA specifically at 5 ′-ACA-3 ′ sites situated in single-stranded regions. In contrast, our work reported here shows that native MazF protein cleaves RNA at the 5 ′ side of residue A in 5 ′-NAC-3 ′ sequences (where N is preferentially U or A). MazF-dependent cleavage occurred at target sequences situated either in single- or double-stranded RNA regions. These activities were neutralized by a His6-MazE antitoxin. Although essentially consistent with previous in vivo reports on the substrate specificity of MazF, our results strongly suggest that the endoribonuclease activity of MazF may be modulated by additional factors to cleave messenger and other cellular RNAs.
ISSN:0014-5793
1873-3468
DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.005