Hand-Rubbing With an Aqueous Alcoholic Solution vs Traditional Surgical Hand-Scrubbing and 30-Day Surgical Site Infection Rates: A Randomized Equivalence Study
CONTEXT Surgical site infections prolong hospital stays, are among the leading nosocomial causes of morbidity, and a source of excess medical costs. Clinical studies comparing the risk of nosocomial infection after different hand antisepsis protocols are scarce. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectivenes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002-08, Vol.288 (6), p.722-727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Surgical site infections prolong hospital stays, are among the leading
nosocomial causes of morbidity, and a source of excess medical costs. Clinical
studies comparing the risk of nosocomial infection after different hand antisepsis
protocols are scarce. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of hand-cleansing protocols in preventing
surgical site infections during routine surgical practice. DESIGN Randomized equivalence trial. SETTING Six surgical services from teaching and nonteaching hospitals in France. PATIENTS A total of 4387 consecutive patients who underwent clean and clean-contaminated
surgery between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2001. INTERVENTIONS Surgical services used 2 hand-cleansing methods alternately every other
month: a hand-rubbing protocol with 75% aqueous alcoholic solution containing
propanol-1, propanol-2, and mecetronium etilsulfate; and a hand-scrubbing
protocol with antiseptic preparation containing 4% povidone iodine or 4% chlorhexidine
gluconate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Thirty-day surgical site infection rates were the primary end point;
operating department teams' tolerance of and compliance with hand antisepsis
were secondary end points. RESULTS The 2 protocols were comparable in regard to surgical site infection
risk factors. Surgical site infection rates were 55 of 2252 (2.44%) in the
hand-rubbing protocol and 53 of 2135 (2.48%) in the hand-scrubbing protocol,
for a difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, −0.88% to 0.96%).
Based on subsets of personnel, compliance with the recommended duration of
hand antisepsis was better in the hand-rubbing protocol of the study compared
with the hand-scrubbing protocol (44% vs 28%, respectively; P = .008), as was tolerance, with less skin dryness and less skin irritation
after aqueous solution use. CONCLUSIONS Hand-rubbing with aqueous alcoholic solution, preceded by a 1-minute
nonantiseptic hand wash before each surgeon's first procedure of the day and
before any other procedure if the hands were soiled, was as effective as traditional
hand-scrubbing with antiseptic soap in preventing surgical site infections.
The hand-rubbing protocol was better tolerated by the surgical teams and improved
compliance with hygiene guidelines. Hand-rubbing with liquid aqueous alcoholic
solution can thus be safely used as an alternative to traditional surgical
hand-scrubbing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.288.6.722 |