Cutaneous silent period in hand muscle is evoked by laser stimulation of the palm, but not the hand dorsum

Painful electrical stimulation of the fingers evokes an inhibitory response in hand muscles (cutaneous silent period, CSP). The aim of this study was to determine whether purely nociceptive thermal stimuli applied to the hand evoke a CSP. High‐intensity laser pulses (205 ± 44 mJ) were delivered to t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2004-06, Vol.29 (6), p.870-872
Hauptverfasser: Romaniello, A., Truini, A., Galeotti, F., De Lena, C., Willer, J. C., Cruccu, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Painful electrical stimulation of the fingers evokes an inhibitory response in hand muscles (cutaneous silent period, CSP). The aim of this study was to determine whether purely nociceptive thermal stimuli applied to the hand evoke a CSP. High‐intensity laser pulses (205 ± 44 mJ) were delivered to the dorsum and palm of the hand in five volunteers. Electromyographic signals were recorded from the ipsilateral first dorsal interosseous muscle. We then compared the laser‐evoked CSP with the CSP induced by electrical stimulation. A clear laser CSP (latency 90 ± 7 ms) was evoked in all subjects when laser pulses were applied to the palm of the hand, whereas no response was recorded after stimulation of the dorsum. Electrical stimulation of both the dorsum and the palm evoked a CSP (latency 65 ± 5 ms), although the reflex threshold was significantly lower after stimulation of the palm. This study confirms that the CSP is a nociceptive response specific to limbs that grasp. In humans, palm nociceptors are probably more functionally effective than dorsal nociceptors in inducing the hand‐muscle inhibition that interrupts hand prehension (so that a potentially noxious source is dropped) before proximal muscles withdraw the limb. Muscle Nerve 29: 870–872, 2004
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.20040