The contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®) and hemostasis: a comparative study
This open-label, nonrandomized study compared changes in hemostatic variables during NuvaRing® and oral levonorgestrel 150 μg/ethinylestradiol 30 μg (LNG/EE) use for six cycles. Eighty-seven women started the study, 44 with NuvaRing and 43 with the LNG/EE oral contraceptive. For most procoagulation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 2004-06, Vol.69 (6), p.461-467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This open-label, nonrandomized study compared changes in hemostatic variables during NuvaRing® and oral levonorgestrel 150 μg/ethinylestradiol 30 μg (LNG/EE) use for six cycles. Eighty-seven women started the study, 44 with NuvaRing and 43 with the LNG/EE oral contraceptive. For most procoagulation variables, there was no difference between NuvaRing and oral LNG/EE; only Factor VII levels increased in the NuvaRing group and decreased in the LNG/EE group. The majority of assessed variables show that anticoagulation and fibrinolytic activity was comparable between the NuvaRing and oral LNG/EE groups. Antithrombin activity and protein C activity both tended to be higher with NuvaRing. Levels of tissue plasminogen activator decreased in both groups but the reduction was smaller with NuvaRing. There were no significant differences in fibrin turnover between the treatment groups. The data show that both NuvaRing and oral LNG/EE are associated with a minimal effect on hemostatic variables. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.12.010 |