Reducing dose at barium enema: radiographers do it digitally

It has been previously shown that, whilst radiographers in our hospital can undertake barium enema examinations with the same degree of diagnostic accuracy as consultant radiologists, there was a dose penalty to the patient arising from the use of a restrictive protocol requiring radiographers to ta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2002-08, Vol.75 (896), p.652-656
Hauptverfasser: CRAWLEY, M. T, BOOTH, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It has been previously shown that, whilst radiographers in our hospital can undertake barium enema examinations with the same degree of diagnostic accuracy as consultant radiologists, there was a dose penalty to the patient arising from the use of a restrictive protocol requiring radiographers to take a series of plain radiographs for reporting purposes. For the past 3 years radiographers at this hospital have worked to a new protocol that replaces all routine radiographs with digital spot films. In the present study, dose-area product (DAP) measurements for 801 barium enema examinations performed by consultant radiologists and radiographers, using the revised protocol, were analysed and compared to ascertain whether there were still significant differences in radiation dose to the patient depending on the category of staff performing the examination. All examinations were reported by a consultant radiologist. The radiologists' reports were analysed against the known outcomes to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the examination when carried out by the two categories of staff. This study shows that using a modified protocol, in which digital spot films replace the series of overcouch radiographs for reporting, our radiographers are able to perform barium enemas without dose penalty to the patient, and without compromizing diagnostic accuracy. Means with 95% confidence intervals for DAP in the two groups were 9.8 Gycm(2) (9.4-10.3 Gycm(2)) and 10.7 Gycm(2) (10.2-11.1 Gycm(2)) for radiographers and radiologists, respectively.
ISSN:0007-1285
1748-880X
DOI:10.1259/bjr.75.896.750652