The Effect of Graft-Tunnel Diameter Disparity on Intraosseous Healing of the Flexor Tendon Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Background: Graft-to-tunnel healing is a significant factor in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but there have been few studies on the effect of graft-tunnel diameter disparity on intraosseous healing of the flexor tendon graft. Hypothesis: Graft-tunnel diameter disparity of 2 mm has no ef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2002-07, Vol.30 (4), p.498-505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Graft-to-tunnel healing is a significant factor in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but there have been few studies
on the effect of graft-tunnel diameter disparity on intraosseous healing of the flexor tendon graft.
Hypothesis: Graft-tunnel diameter disparity of 2 mm has no effect on the pull-out strength of the graft from the bone tunnel.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Forty-two beagle dogs were divided into three groups. In each animal, reconstruction was performed in the left knee by using
a 4-mm diameter autogenous flexor tendon for groups 1 and 2 and by using a 4-mm wide bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in group
3. A 4-mm diameter tunnel was drilled in the tibia of groups 1 and 3 and a 6-mm diameter tunnel, in group 2. In each group,
seven animals were sacrificed at 3 and 6 weeks.
Results: The perpendicular fibers connecting the graft to the bone were generated in groups 1 and 2, and the number appeared to be
higher in group 2, where the space was greater. There was no significant difference in the ultimate failure load between groups
1 and 2 at each period.
Conclusion: Graft-tunnel diameter disparity of up to 2 mm may not adversely affect intraosseous healing of the flexor tendon graft.
Clinical Relevance: Surgeons need not be overly concerned about minor graft-tunnel diameter disparities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
DOI: | 10.1177/03635465020300040901 |