Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients
In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Burns |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Wolter, T.P Fuchs, P.C Horvat, N Pallua, N |
description | In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU.
To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared.
No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality.
The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71929017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417903003632</els_id><sourcerecordid>71929017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e261t-253978be5193f2d405d807e09678a1708b8cbe04a70e17cb8c61b19142ae61573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UdtKw0AQXUSxtfoFguyTb4kzuW1WECmlaqFgH_R5yWVit-RSs0mkf-_GqvMyzHBm5pw5jF0juAgY3e3ctG9r43oAvoueCwgnbIqxkA4GIE_ZFHwInQCFnLALY3ZgI4zhnE0wxCBEGU1ZsTJ8qz-2fLNcbnjZfPGhKfuK-EB1p8uk003Ndc3HU3xvS9s2PKWaCp3ppHy853PeUtc2Zk9ZpwfipuvzA28KHuH_xCU7K5LS0NVvnrH3p-Xb4sVZvz6vFvO1Q16EneOFvhRxSpabX3h5AGEegyCQkYgTFBCncZYSBIkAQpHZKsIUJQZeQhGGwp-x2-Pefdt89mQ6VWmTUVkmNTW9UQKlJwFH4M0vsE8rytW-1VXSHtTfZyzg4QggS3fQ1CqTWSkZ5bq1QlXeaIWgRifUTv04oUYnFHrKOuF_A0eOews</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71929017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><description>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU.
To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared.
No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality.
The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15145196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Burn patients ; Burns, Inhalation - therapy ; Critical Care - methods ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Inhalation injury ; Injury Severity Score ; Lung Diseases - etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Open lung concept ; Oxygen - blood ; Partial Pressure ; PEEP ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Retrospective study ; Scoring systems ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventilation strategies</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417903003632$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15145196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU.
To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared.
No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality.
The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Burn patients</subject><subject>Burns, Inhalation - therapy</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhalation injury</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Open lung concept</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Partial Pressure</subject><subject>PEEP</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective study</subject><subject>Scoring systems</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventilation strategies</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UdtKw0AQXUSxtfoFguyTb4kzuW1WECmlaqFgH_R5yWVit-RSs0mkf-_GqvMyzHBm5pw5jF0juAgY3e3ctG9r43oAvoueCwgnbIqxkA4GIE_ZFHwInQCFnLALY3ZgI4zhnE0wxCBEGU1ZsTJ8qz-2fLNcbnjZfPGhKfuK-EB1p8uk003Ndc3HU3xvS9s2PKWaCp3ppHy853PeUtc2Zk9ZpwfipuvzA28KHuH_xCU7K5LS0NVvnrH3p-Xb4sVZvz6vFvO1Q16EneOFvhRxSpabX3h5AGEegyCQkYgTFBCncZYSBIkAQpHZKsIUJQZeQhGGwp-x2-Pefdt89mQ6VWmTUVkmNTW9UQKlJwFH4M0vsE8rytW-1VXSHtTfZyzg4QggS3fQ1CqTWSkZ5bq1QlXeaIWgRifUTv04oUYnFHrKOuF_A0eOews</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Wolter, T.P</creator><creator>Fuchs, P.C</creator><creator>Horvat, N</creator><creator>Pallua, N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><author>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e261t-253978be5193f2d405d807e09678a1708b8cbe04a70e17cb8c61b19142ae61573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Burn patients</topic><topic>Burns, Inhalation - therapy</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhalation injury</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Open lung concept</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Partial Pressure</topic><topic>PEEP</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective study</topic><topic>Scoring systems</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventilation strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolter, T.P</au><au>Fuchs, P.C</au><au>Horvat, N</au><au>Pallua, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>368-373</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU.
To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared.
No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality.
The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15145196</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
ispartof | Burns, 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373 |
issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71929017 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Burn patients Burns, Inhalation - therapy Critical Care - methods Female Hospital Mortality Humans Inhalation injury Injury Severity Score Lung Diseases - etiology Male Middle Aged Open lung concept Oxygen - blood Partial Pressure PEEP Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods Retrospective Studies Retrospective study Scoring systems Treatment Outcome Ventilation strategies |
title | Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20high%20PEEP%20low%20volume%20ventilation%20in%20burn%20patients%20beneficial?:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20of%2061%20patients&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Wolter,%20T.P&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=368-373&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71929017%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71929017&rft_id=info:pmid/15145196&rft_els_id=S0305417903003632&rfr_iscdi=true |