Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients

In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373
Hauptverfasser: Wolter, T.P, Fuchs, P.C, Horvat, N, Pallua, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 373
container_issue 4
container_start_page 368
container_title Burns
container_volume 30
creator Wolter, T.P
Fuchs, P.C
Horvat, N
Pallua, N
description In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU. To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared. No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality. The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71929017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417903003632</els_id><sourcerecordid>71929017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e261t-253978be5193f2d405d807e09678a1708b8cbe04a70e17cb8c61b19142ae61573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UdtKw0AQXUSxtfoFguyTb4kzuW1WECmlaqFgH_R5yWVit-RSs0mkf-_GqvMyzHBm5pw5jF0juAgY3e3ctG9r43oAvoueCwgnbIqxkA4GIE_ZFHwInQCFnLALY3ZgI4zhnE0wxCBEGU1ZsTJ8qz-2fLNcbnjZfPGhKfuK-EB1p8uk003Ndc3HU3xvS9s2PKWaCp3ppHy853PeUtc2Zk9ZpwfipuvzA28KHuH_xCU7K5LS0NVvnrH3p-Xb4sVZvz6vFvO1Q16EneOFvhRxSpabX3h5AGEegyCQkYgTFBCncZYSBIkAQpHZKsIUJQZeQhGGwp-x2-Pefdt89mQ6VWmTUVkmNTW9UQKlJwFH4M0vsE8rytW-1VXSHtTfZyzg4QggS3fQ1CqTWSkZ5bq1QlXeaIWgRifUTv04oUYnFHrKOuF_A0eOews</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71929017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><description>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU. To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared. No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality. The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15145196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Burn patients ; Burns, Inhalation - therapy ; Critical Care - methods ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Inhalation injury ; Injury Severity Score ; Lung Diseases - etiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Open lung concept ; Oxygen - blood ; Partial Pressure ; PEEP ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Retrospective study ; Scoring systems ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventilation strategies</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417903003632$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15145196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU. To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared. No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality. The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Burn patients</subject><subject>Burns, Inhalation - therapy</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhalation injury</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Open lung concept</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Partial Pressure</subject><subject>PEEP</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective study</subject><subject>Scoring systems</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventilation strategies</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UdtKw0AQXUSxtfoFguyTb4kzuW1WECmlaqFgH_R5yWVit-RSs0mkf-_GqvMyzHBm5pw5jF0juAgY3e3ctG9r43oAvoueCwgnbIqxkA4GIE_ZFHwInQCFnLALY3ZgI4zhnE0wxCBEGU1ZsTJ8qz-2fLNcbnjZfPGhKfuK-EB1p8uk003Ndc3HU3xvS9s2PKWaCp3ppHy853PeUtc2Zk9ZpwfipuvzA28KHuH_xCU7K5LS0NVvnrH3p-Xb4sVZvz6vFvO1Q16EneOFvhRxSpabX3h5AGEegyCQkYgTFBCncZYSBIkAQpHZKsIUJQZeQhGGwp-x2-Pefdt89mQ6VWmTUVkmNTW9UQKlJwFH4M0vsE8rytW-1VXSHtTfZyzg4QggS3fQ1CqTWSkZ5bq1QlXeaIWgRifUTv04oUYnFHrKOuF_A0eOews</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Wolter, T.P</creator><creator>Fuchs, P.C</creator><creator>Horvat, N</creator><creator>Pallua, N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</title><author>Wolter, T.P ; Fuchs, P.C ; Horvat, N ; Pallua, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e261t-253978be5193f2d405d807e09678a1708b8cbe04a70e17cb8c61b19142ae61573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Burn patients</topic><topic>Burns, Inhalation - therapy</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhalation injury</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Open lung concept</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Partial Pressure</topic><topic>PEEP</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective study</topic><topic>Scoring systems</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventilation strategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolter, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvat, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallua, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolter, T.P</au><au>Fuchs, P.C</au><au>Horvat, N</au><au>Pallua, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>368-373</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU. To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared. No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality. The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15145196</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-4179
ispartof Burns, 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373
issn 0305-4179
1879-1409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71929017
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Burn patients
Burns, Inhalation - therapy
Critical Care - methods
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Inhalation injury
Injury Severity Score
Lung Diseases - etiology
Male
Middle Aged
Open lung concept
Oxygen - blood
Partial Pressure
PEEP
Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects
Positive-Pressure Respiration - methods
Retrospective Studies
Retrospective study
Scoring systems
Treatment Outcome
Ventilation strategies
title Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20high%20PEEP%20low%20volume%20ventilation%20in%20burn%20patients%20beneficial?:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20of%2061%20patients&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Wolter,%20T.P&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=368-373&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71929017%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71929017&rft_id=info:pmid/15145196&rft_els_id=S0305417903003632&rfr_iscdi=true