Is high PEEP low volume ventilation in burn patients beneficial?: A retrospective study of 61 patients

In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2004-06, Vol.30 (4), p.368-373
Hauptverfasser: Wolter, T.P, Fuchs, P.C, Horvat, N, Pallua, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In burn care lung damage by inhalation injury is a major cause of mortality in burn patients. In the field of intensive care medicine ventilation strategies to reduce lung injury caused by ventilation are under investigation. The promising results of the application of pressure controlled high PEEP low volume (HPLV) ventilation prompted us to use this ventilation strategy in our burn ICU. To establish whether this ventilation regime is beneficial the charts of 61 consecutive patients needing artificial respiration were reviewed. A scoring system for PEEP level and tidal volume was developed and treatment groups with high PEEP and low volume and low PEEP high volume regimes were compared. No statistically significant differences could be found when comparing treatment versus mortality, the number of pulmonary complications or incidence of pneumothoraces. However, the trend showed a benefit in mortality for patients with an ABSI scoring up to 9, but at the same time pulmonary complications increase. The Horovitz oxygenation index showed no advantage for the HPLV Group. In a separate analysis we found a significant correlation between absolute PEEP and mortality. The correlation between PEEP level and mortality is a dynamic factor predicting outcome, This not been described yet and can be an addition to the static ABSI score. Differences between ventilation strategies were not as evident as expected in this retrospective study, so prospective randomized studies are needed.
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2003.12.010