Comparison of port access to sternotomy in tricuspid or mitral/tricuspid operations
Outcomes for a port-access (PA) approach for tricuspid valve operations have not been reported or compared to those using median sternotomy (MS). Retrospective analysis was performed for 88 consecutive patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair or replacement using port-access techniques (n = 27, 19...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Heart surgery forum 2002, Vol.5 (2), p.136-140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Outcomes for a port-access (PA) approach for tricuspid valve operations have not been reported or compared to those using median sternotomy (MS).
Retrospective analysis was performed for 88 consecutive patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair or replacement using port-access techniques (n = 27, 1997-2000) versus sternotomy (n = 61, 1990-1997). PA procedures were performed through a 6 cm right fourth interspace thoracotomy.
PA patients had lower ejection fractions (46% +/- 11% vs. 54% +/- 10%, p = 0.02), but had a similar incidence of previous surgery (17/27 (63%) vs. 33/61 (54%), p = 0.4). PA patients had more frequent concurrent mitral valve operations (22/27 (82%) vs. 37/61 (61%), p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1098-3511 |