Atrioventricular Block During Upright Tilt Table Test

Patients with a cardioinhibitory response (asystole or atrioventricular block [AVB]) during upright tilt table test (UTT) constitute a therapeutic challenge. Our present knowledge is partial and in those who experience AVB is absent. Furthermore, we ignore if there is any difference between both groups, particularly pacemaker indication. We aimed to study patients with a cardioinhibitory response during UTT and incidence of AVB during UTT, compared to asystole; plus the outcome during prolonged follow‐up. Of 867 patients who underwent UTT, 172 were positive for a neurally mediated response, all with normal neurocardiovascular evaluation. Of the 172 patients, 6 (3.4%) developed AV block (group A), and 26 (15.1%) experienced asystole (group B). Group A included 6 women (100%), mean age 21 ± 12 years. All patients in group A had sinus rate deceleration during AVB. Group B included 10 women (38%), mean age 28 ± 17 years, and a mean pause of 15 ± 9 seconds. We contacted 30 of 32 patients, mean follow‐up of 45 ± 38 months. Seven patients in group B had syncopal recurrences; five had 2 or more episodes. One patient from group B received a DDD pacemaker. In group A, one had one recurrence. No deaths were observed. AVB during UTT is rare, occurs in young women, and is always associated with sinus rate deceleration. Medium‐ to long‐term prognosis is good, and equivalent to patients with asystole. There is no evidence that patients with AVB during UTT require a pacemaker implant. (PACE 2004; 27:632–638)