Comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses in patients with TMD history

summary  The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a well‐defined clinical examination for diagnosing anterior disc displacement with and without reduction. A series of 40 patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) history were examined according to well‐defined routine cr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2004-01, Vol.31 (1), p.52-56
Hauptverfasser: Üşümez, S., Öz, F., Güray, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:summary  The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a well‐defined clinical examination for diagnosing anterior disc displacement with and without reduction. A series of 40 patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) history were examined according to well‐defined routine criteria. This examination included detailed history‐taking, standardized clinical head and neck examination that included measurements of the range of motion, palpation of the temporomandibular joints and muscles of mastication for pain and auscultation of joint sounds. Magnetic resonance images of the joints were used as ‘gold standard’. Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination was 83% for determining normal disc–condyle relationship, 72% for diagnosing anterior disc displacement with reduction, and 81% for diagnosing anterior disc displacement without reduction. Our results suggest that anterior displacement of the disc can be diagnosed with considerable accuracy using a well‐defined clinical examination only. Therefore, we conclude that not all patients with TMD symptoms require magnetic resonance imaging examination before treatment.
ISSN:0305-182X
1365-2842
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01065.x