Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment

A weight‐bearing ovine model was used to quantify cancellous bone ingrowth and remodeling in porous‐coated implants over 6, 12, and 24 weeks in situ. The null hypothesis for the investigation was that there would be no significant difference between the amount of cancellous bone ingrowth and rate of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research 2004-06, Vol.69A (3), p.567-576
Hauptverfasser: Willie, Bettina M., Bloebaum, Roy D., Bireley, William R., Bachus, Kent N., Hofmann, Aaron A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A weight‐bearing ovine model was used to quantify cancellous bone ingrowth and remodeling in porous‐coated implants over 6, 12, and 24 weeks in situ. The null hypothesis for the investigation was that there would be no significant difference between the amount of cancellous bone ingrowth and rate of remodeling in this ovine model compared to a reported human bilateral implant model. Bone ingrowth progressed from 20.1 ± 8.2% at 6 weeks in situ to 23.8 ± 7.9% at 12 weeks, and 30 ± 5.1% at 24 weeks. Fluorochrome analysis demonstrated a mineral apposition rate of 1.07 ± 0.28 μm/day for bone at the porous‐coating interface, whereas host bone remodeling at 0.89 ± 0.23 μm/day. Histological analysis showed no adverse tissue or inflammatory response. The null hypothesis was supported in that regression analysis demonstrated that the amount of cancellous bone ingrowth over time (p = 0.545) and mineral apposition rate over time (p = 0.089) in this ovine model was not significantly different than reported human bilateral knee data. The results of this study appear to validate the ovine model for use in understanding skeletal attachment of porous‐coated implants to cancellous bone in humans. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 69A: 567–576, 2004
ISSN:1549-3296
0021-9304
1552-4965
1097-4636
DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.30038