Ventilation tube removal: Does treatment affect perforation closure?

Objective: The study goal was to determine whether treatment of the tympanic membrane at the time of ventilation tube (VT) removal affects closure of the perforation. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review and telephone follow-up of children who underwent VT removal from 1995 throug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2002-06, Vol.126 (6), p.663-668
Hauptverfasser: Schwartz, Kara M., Orvidas, Laura J., Weaver, Amy L., Thieling, Sarah E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The study goal was to determine whether treatment of the tympanic membrane at the time of ventilation tube (VT) removal affects closure of the perforation. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review and telephone follow-up of children who underwent VT removal from 1995 through 1998. Results: Among 109 patients (162 ears; 58% male), the mean age at VT removal was 6.7 years. Most VTs (59%) were T-tubes, and most (91%) were removed because of prolonged retention (mean 2.3 years). After VT removal, 111 ears (69%) received treatment, most commonly (44%) with 25% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). At the latest follow-up, 151 of the ears (93%) had healed without additional treatment. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in ears not initially treated with TCA (TCA 3% failure, other treatment 13%, no treatment 8%) and in ears with VTs removed because of otorrhea. Conclusions: Most perforations healed. TCA may promote closure, but a large randomized clinical trial is needed to eliminate physician bias. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:663-668.)
ISSN:0194-5998
1097-6817
DOI:10.1067/mhn.2002.125605