Ventilation tube removal: Does treatment affect perforation closure?
Objective: The study goal was to determine whether treatment of the tympanic membrane at the time of ventilation tube (VT) removal affects closure of the perforation. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review and telephone follow-up of children who underwent VT removal from 1995 throug...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2002-06, Vol.126 (6), p.663-668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: The study goal was to determine whether treatment of the tympanic membrane at the time of ventilation tube (VT) removal affects closure of the perforation.
Study Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review and telephone follow-up of children who underwent VT removal from 1995 through 1998.
Results: Among 109 patients (162 ears; 58% male), the mean age at VT removal was 6.7 years. Most VTs (59%) were T-tubes, and most (91%) were removed because of prolonged retention (mean 2.3 years). After VT removal, 111 ears (69%) received treatment, most commonly (44%) with 25% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). At the latest follow-up, 151 of the ears (93%) had healed without additional treatment. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in ears not initially treated with TCA (TCA 3% failure, other treatment 13%, no treatment 8%) and in ears with VTs removed because of otorrhea.
Conclusions: Most perforations healed. TCA may promote closure, but a large randomized clinical trial is needed to eliminate physician bias.
(Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:663-668.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
DOI: | 10.1067/mhn.2002.125605 |