Results from a European Clinical Investigation of the Nucleus® Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant

OBJECTIVEThis study was designed to investigate the perceptual benefits and potential risks of implanting the Nucleus® multichannel auditory brainstem implant. DESIGNBetween September 1992 and October 1997 a total of 27 subjects received a Nucleus 20- or 21-channel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 2002-06, Vol.23 (3), p.170-183
Hauptverfasser: Nevison, Barry, Laszig, Roland, Sollmann, Wolf-Peter, Lenarz, Thomas, Sterkers, Olivier, Ramsden, Richard, Fraysse, Bernard, Manrique, Manuel, Rask-Andersen, Helge, Garcia-Ibanez, Emilio, Colletti, Vittorio, von Wallenberg, Ernst
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVEThis study was designed to investigate the perceptual benefits and potential risks of implanting the Nucleus® multichannel auditory brainstem implant. DESIGNBetween September 1992 and October 1997 a total of 27 subjects received a Nucleus 20- or 21-channel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI). All subjects involved in the trial had bilateral acoustic tumour as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) resulting in complete dysfunction of the VIIIth nerve. The study used each subject as their own control without a preoperative baseline because residual hearing, if existing, was destroyed at surgery by tumour removal. A battery of speech tests was conducted to evaluate each patient’s performance and communication abilities. Tests were conducted, where possible, in the auditory-only, visual-only, and auditory-visual conditions at 3 days postoperatively (baseline), at 3-mo intervals for the first year and every 12 mo thereafter. A subjective performance questionnaire was administered together with an extensive neurological examination at each test interval. RESULTS27 subjects involved in this trial were successfully implanted with a Nucleus ABI. One subject died 2 days postoperatively due to a lung embolism unrelated to the device. Twenty-six subjects underwent device activation and all but one patient received auditory sensation at initial stimulation (96.2%). On average 8.6 (±4.2) of the available 21 electrodes were used in the patients’ MAPs. Performance evaluation measures showed that the majority of users had access to auditory information such as environmental sound awareness together with stress and rhythm cues in speech that assist with lipreading. Although most subjects did not achieve any functional auditory-alone, open-set speech understanding, two subjects from this series (7.4%) did receive sufficient benefit to be able to use the ABI in conversation without lipreading. CONCLUSIONSAlthough the medical risks and surgical complexity associated with ABI device implantation are far greater than those for a cochlear implant, the clinical results from this trial show that the Nucleus multichannel ABI is capable of providing a significant patient benefit over risk ratio for subjects suffering loss of hearing due to bilateral retrocochlear lesions.
ISSN:0196-0202
1538-4667
DOI:10.1097/00003446-200206000-00002