Hospitalization vs. outpatient care in the management of triplet gestations

Objective: To compare the course and outcome of triplet gestations under a preventive care strategy that includes hospitalization, surveillance, bed rest, and daily specialized care from the beginning of the second trimester, with pregnancies managed according to the Croatian standard outpatient car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2002-06, Vol.77 (3), p.223-229
Hauptverfasser: Skrablin, S., Kuvacic, I., Jukic, P., Kalafatic, D., Peter, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare the course and outcome of triplet gestations under a preventive care strategy that includes hospitalization, surveillance, bed rest, and daily specialized care from the beginning of the second trimester, with pregnancies managed according to the Croatian standard outpatient care protocol for multiplets. Methods: A retrospective study of 79 triplet pregnancies. Preventive hospitalization from the beginning of the second trimester, with complete bed rest and all necessary interventions, was chosen by 55 women (Group I). The remaining 24 women (Group II) elected the standard outpatient protocol for multiple pregnancies. Outpatient management with prophylactic bed rest was initiated at home as soon as the multiple pregnancy was diagnosed. After 28 weeks of gestation, all outpatients were hospitalized until delivery irrespective of symptoms. Results: There was no difference between the groups regarding maternal age, race, pre-pregnancy weight and height, weight gain during the first 24 weeks of pregnancy, or the proportion of pregnancies achieved with assisted reproductive technology. Four out of 55 women (7.2%) from Group I and 4 out of 24 women (12.5%) from Group II had monochorionic triplet pregnancies ( P=n.s.). Nulliparity was more frequent in Group I than in Group II ( P=0.006). Elective cesarean delivery was significantly more frequent in Group I (46 out of 55 gestations, 72.7%) than in Group II (9 out of 24 gestations, 37.5%), P=0.024. Gestational age at delivery and mean birth weight were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II ( P
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00060-7