Early discharge and home rehabilitation after hip fracture achieves functional improvements: a randomized controlled trial
Objective: To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture. Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2002-06, Vol.16 (4), p.406-413 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture.
Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture.
Setting: Three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, Australia. Subjects: Sixty-six patients with fractured hip. Interventions: Patients assigned to the home-based rehabilitation group were discharged within 48 hours of randomization. The project team therapists made visits to the patient’s home and negotiated a set of realistic, short-term and measurable treatment goals with both the patient and carer. Those randomized to usual care remained in hospital for conventional rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures: Physical and social dependence, balance con”dence, quality of life, carer strain, patient and carer satisfaction, use of community services and incidence of adverse events such as re-admission and falls.
Results: While there was no difference between the groups for all measures of quality of life, patients in the accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation group recorded a greater improvement in MBI from randomization (p < 0.05) and scored higher on the Falls Ef”cacy Scale (p < 0.05) at four months. There was no difference in falls rates. Patients in the home-based rehabilitation group had a shorter stay in hospital (p < 0.05) but a longer stay in rehabilitation overall (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable on the rate and length of admissions after discharge, use of community services, need for carer input and contact with general practitioner (GP) after discharge. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2155 1477-0873 |
DOI: | 10.1191/0269215502cr518oa |