Early discharge and home rehabilitation after hip fracture achieves functional improvements: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture. Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rehabilitation 2002-06, Vol.16 (4), p.406-413
Hauptverfasser: Crotty, Maria, Whitehead, Craig H, Gray, Steven, Finucane, Paul M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture. Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture. Setting: Three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, Australia. Subjects: Sixty-six patients with fractured hip. Interventions: Patients assigned to the home-based rehabilitation group were discharged within 48 hours of randomization. The project team therapists made visits to the patient’s home and negotiated a set of realistic, short-term and measurable treatment goals with both the patient and carer. Those randomized to usual care remained in hospital for conventional rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: Physical and social dependence, balance con”dence, quality of life, carer strain, patient and carer satisfaction, use of community services and incidence of adverse events such as re-admission and falls. Results: While there was no difference between the groups for all measures of quality of life, patients in the accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation group recorded a greater improvement in MBI from randomization (p < 0.05) and scored higher on the Falls Ef”cacy Scale (p < 0.05) at four months. There was no difference in falls rates. Patients in the home-based rehabilitation group had a shorter stay in hospital (p < 0.05) but a longer stay in rehabilitation overall (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable on the rate and length of admissions after discharge, use of community services, need for carer input and contact with general practitioner (GP) after discharge.
ISSN:0269-2155
1477-0873
DOI:10.1191/0269215502cr518oa