Infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation: incidence, timing, and outcome

To review the incidence, timing, and outcome of infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation (IT). A retrospective review of all patients undergoing IT at a single institution between 1991 and 2003 was analyze with standard statistical tools. Among 33 IT recipients, 13 (39%) developed 20 cu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2004-03, Vol.36 (2), p.379-380
Hauptverfasser: Ziring, D, Tran, R, Edelstein, S, McDiarmid, S.V, Vargas, J, Cortina, G, Gajjar, N, Ching, N, Cherry, J, Krogstad, P, Renz, J.F, Fondevila, C, Busuttil, R.W, Farmer, D.G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To review the incidence, timing, and outcome of infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation (IT). A retrospective review of all patients undergoing IT at a single institution between 1991 and 2003 was analyze with standard statistical tools. Among 33 IT recipients, 13 (39%) developed 20 culture- or biopsy-proven episodes of infectious enteritis. The recipient demographics were 77% men and median age 2.6 years. Infections were diagnosed at a median of 76 days (32 to 1800) after IT. There were 14 viral (CMV one, rotavirus eight, adenovirus four, EBV one, three bacterial ( Clostridium difficile), and three other infections ( Giardia lamblia one, cryptosporidium two). Complete resolution was achieved in 17 (94%) infectious after appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy. Interestingly, there were six rejection episodes following infectious enteritis. Grafts were lost to rejection after rotaviral enteritis ( n = 1) and adenoviral enteritis misdiagnosed as rejection ( n = 1). Patient and graft survival were not adversely affected by infections. Infectious enteritis occurs frequently after IT. Viral agents are the cause in two-thirds of cases. With supportive care and appropriate treatment, resolution is possible in the majority of cases. Differentiating rejection and infection by histopathology can be difficult.
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.093