Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
CONTEXT Salvage radiotherapy may potentially cure patients with disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy, but previous evidence has suggested that it is ineffective in patients at the highest risk of metastatic disease progression. OBJECTIVE To delineate patients who may benefit from salvage r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2004-03, Vol.291 (11), p.1325-1332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Salvage radiotherapy may potentially cure patients with disease recurrence
after radical prostatectomy, but previous evidence has suggested that it is
ineffective in patients at the highest risk of metastatic disease progression. OBJECTIVE To delineate patients who may benefit from salvage radiotherapy for
prostate cancer recurrence by identifying variables associated with a durable
response. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Retrospective review of a cohort of 501 patients at 5 US academic tertiary
referral centers who received salvage radiotherapy between June 1987 and November
2002 for detectable and increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels
after radical prostatectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Disease progression after salvage radiotherapy, defined as a serum PSA
value ≥0.1 ng/mL above the postradiotherapy PSA nadir confirmed by a second
PSA measurement that was higher than the first by any amount, by a continued
increase in PSA level after treatment, or by the initiation of androgen deprivation
therapy after treatment. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 45 months, 250 patients (50%) experienced
disease progression after treatment, 49 (10%) developed distant metastases,
20 (4%) died from prostate cancer, and 21 (4%) died from other or unknown
causes. The 4-year progression-free probability (PFP) was 45% (95% confidence
interval [CI], 40%-50%). By multivariable analysis, predictors of progression
were Gleason score of 8 to 10 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.1; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.291.11.1325 |