Living kidney donation: recovery and return to activities of daily living
To determine donor nephrectomy outcomes, a one page 20‐item survey of 42 cases was reviewed, including demographics, intervals to normal activities (e.g., driving a car, returning to work), and an open inquiry about the donation process. Hospital records were also reviewed. Nephrectomy under general...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical transplantation 2000-08, Vol.14 (4), p.433-438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine donor nephrectomy outcomes, a one page 20‐item survey of 42 cases was reviewed, including demographics, intervals to normal activities (e.g., driving a car, returning to work), and an open inquiry about the donation process. Hospital records were also reviewed. Nephrectomy under general anesthesia was through an anterior flank, extra‐retroperitoneal approach with postoperative epidural pain control. Early self‐care, progressive ambulation, and prescriptive pulmonary care were undertaken to facilitate recovery. Length of stay averaged 3.4 (range 2–8) d, and mean hospitalization charge was $15 169 (range $10 733–$29 579). Thirty‐four donors were employed outside the home; 18 (53%) returned to work within 4 wk, and the average duration away from work was 4.6 wk (range 6 d–10 wk). Within 2 wk, 25 (59%) were driving an automobile. Usual activities of daily living were fully performed by all donors at a mean of 4.8 wk (minimum 5 d). Forty respondents would donate again, and one might; one did not respond to this question. None reported intermediate or long‐term disabilities and all reported return to their pre‐donation level of activity. With the anterior extra‐retroperitoneal nephrectomy, most donors were out of the hospital within 4 d, were driving within 2 wk, and returned to gainful employment within 4 wk. Living kidney donation, as viewed by the donors, was a positive experience, which appeared to disrupt their lives minimally. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0902-0063 1399-0012 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.14040202.x-i1 |