Analysis of 73 cases of significant pericardiac effusion
Seventy-three patients with significant pericardiac effusion (SPE) are analyzed retrospectively. The results concerning etiology, clinical findings, evolution, echocardiography findings and pericardiac effusion (PE) findings are summarized. Conclusions drawn are: 1) the pericardiac effusion (PE) is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista clínica espanõla 2004-03, Vol.204 (3), p.125-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Seventy-three patients with significant pericardiac effusion (SPE) are analyzed retrospectively. The results concerning etiology, clinical findings, evolution, echocardiography findings and pericardiac effusion (PE) findings are summarized. Conclusions drawn are: 1) the pericardiac effusion (PE) is a difficult diagnosis without the assistance of the echocardiogram; 2) the echocardiogram signs of hemodynamic alterations have prognostic value; 3) the most frequent causes of SPE are: tumors, idiopathic acute pericarditis, and iatrogenesis; 4) in an important percentage of DPS patients the cause is not identified; 5) the clinical presentation as pericardiac tamponade (PT) is most frequent in the tumors; 6) the analysis of the PE has a low yield, which means that diagnostic pericardicentesis is not justified in all patients with SPE; 7) the pericardiac biopsy hasa low diagnostic yield; 8) the predictive mortality factors are: presentation as PT and tumor etiology, and 9) because of the dynamic character of the SPE, it is important to carry out a progress follow-up of it. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-2565 |