The Role of Computational Models in Neuropsychological Investigations of Language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000)

The Role of Computational Models in Neuropsychological Investigations of Language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000)

W. Ruml and A. Caramazza's (2000) analysis of the model of normal and aphasic lexical access proposed by G. S. Dell, M. F. Schwartz, N. Martin, E. M. Saffran, and D. A. Gagnon (1997 ) is completely at odds with current practice concerning the use of models in psychology. An evaluation of Dell e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological review 2000-07, Vol.107 (3), p.635-645
Hauptverfasser: Dell, Gary S, Schwartz, Myrna F, Martin, Nadine, Saffran, Eleanor M, Gagnon, Deborah A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aphasia
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Computer based modeling
Error Analysis
Errors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Language
Lexical Access
Models, Psychological
Naming
Neurophysiology
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reproducibility of Results
Theories
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:W. Ruml and A. Caramazza's (2000) analysis of the model of normal and aphasic lexical access proposed by G. S. Dell, M. F. Schwartz, N. Martin, E. M. Saffran, and D. A. Gagnon (1997 ) is completely at odds with current practice concerning the use of models in psychology. An evaluation of Dell et al.'s original claims using Ruml and Caramazza's model parameters sustains these claims in all respects.
ISSN:0033-295X
1939-1471
DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.635