Use of imaging guides in preimplant tomography

Objectives. The objective of this study was to quantify the variation in use and type of imaging guides used by community-based specialists and general practitioners during dental implant treatment planning phases. The specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that specialists are more l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 2002-04, Vol.93 (4), p.483-487
Hauptverfasser: Almog, Dov M., Torrado, Eduardo, Moss, Mark E., Meitner, Sean W., LaMar, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. The objective of this study was to quantify the variation in use and type of imaging guides used by community-based specialists and general practitioners during dental implant treatment planning phases. The specific aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that specialists are more likely to use some form of cross-sectional imaging in conjunction with imaging guides during the preoperative assessment of dental implant procedures. Study Design. Records from 630 patients with implants (1640 implants) referred for cross-sectional tomography were reviewed. Imaging guide type and implant sites were noted. Results. The distribution of referring dentists by specialty was as follows: general practitioners (42.2%), periodontists (35.1%), oral and maxillofacial surgeons (13.3%), and prosthodontists (7%). Of patients referred for tomograms, 52% were referred without a surgical guide. Conclusion. Specialists ordered tomograms in conjunction with imaging guides more often than did general practitioners. Prosthodontists and periodontists preferred to use more restrictive guides than did general practitioners or oral and maxillofacial surgeons. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:483-7)
ISSN:1079-2104
1528-395X
DOI:10.1067/moe.2002.121389