Eyewitness Researchers as Experts in Court: Responsive to Change in a Dynamic and Rational Process

Eyewitness Researchers as Experts in Court: Responsive to Change in a Dynamic and Rational Process

Kassin et al respond to criticism of their revision of the decade-old survey of eyewitness experts. Believing that psychology's most important contribution is to help reform eyewitness identification procedures, they self-consciously steered clear of absolutely endorsing or rejecting the partic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 2002-05, Vol.57 (5), p.378-379
Hauptverfasser: Kassin, Saul M, Tubb, V. Anne, Hosch, Harmon M, Memon, Amina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Expert Testimony
Expert witness testimony
Humans
Juries
Psychology
Truth Disclosure
Witnesses
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Kassin et al respond to criticism of their revision of the decade-old survey of eyewitness experts. Believing that psychology's most important contribution is to help reform eyewitness identification procedures, they self-consciously steered clear of absolutely endorsing or rejecting the participation of eyewitness experts.
ISSN:0003-066X
1935-990X
DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.57.5.378