Incidence and Prediction of Early Antibody-Mediated Rejection due to Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen-Antibodies

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is responsible for a large proportion of early allograft losses. While preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies (HLA-DSA) are accountable for the majority of these episodes, non-HLA-DSA are also involved. However, data on the incidence of ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation 2008-06, Vol.85 (11), p.1557-1563
Hauptverfasser: AMICO, Patrizia, HONGER, Gideon, BIELMANN, Denise, LUTZ, Doris, GARZONI, Daniela, STEIGER, Jürg, MIHATSCH, Michael J, DRAGUN, Duska, SCHAUB, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is responsible for a large proportion of early allograft losses. While preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibodies (HLA-DSA) are accountable for the majority of these episodes, non-HLA-DSA are also involved. However, data on the incidence of early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA are currently lacking. This study evaluated (i) the incidence of early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA -- defined by exclusion of circulating HLA-DSA detected by flow beads -- and (ii) the association with donor-specific major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene (MICA)-antibodies (MICA-DSA) and angiotensin-receptor antibodies. A retrospective cohort (n=279) risk stratified by complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDC-XM era) and a prospective cohort (n=154) risk stratified by virtual crossmatching using flow beads (virtual-XM era) were investigated. In the CDC-XM era 25/279 patients (9%) developed early AMR, but only 3/154 patients (2%) in the virtual-XM era (P=0.004). The incidence of early AMR due to HLA-DSA was significantly higher in the CDC-XM era than in virtual-XM era (18/279 patients [6.5%] vs. 0/154 patients [0%]; P=0.0005). However, the incidence of early AMR presumably due to non-HLA-DSA remained unchanged in these two cohorts (7/279 patients [2.5%] vs. 3/154 patients [2%]; P=1.0) consistent with a persisting gap in the ability to identify preformed DSA. Overall, 10/433 patients (2.3%) experienced early AMR presumably due to non-HLA-DSA. None of these 10 patients had angiotensin-receptor antibodies, at most 3/10 patients had MICA-DSA, while the antibodies remained unexplained in 7/10 cases. Early AMR due to non-HLA-DSA is a rare event, which is still difficult to predict by currently available assays.
ISSN:0041-1337
1534-6080
DOI:10.1097/tp.0b013e31816f612a