Effect of driving pressure and nebulizer model on aerosol output during intermittent delivery with a dosimeter
Recent guidelines reinforce the need for a standardized technique during inhalational bronchoprovocation challenge testing. We investigated the effects of nebulizer model and dosimeter driving pressure on nebulizer output using a nebulized saline model. Four nebulizers (Hudson 1720, Salter 8900, Bax...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aerosol medicine 2002-03, Vol.15 (1), p.1-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent guidelines reinforce the need for a standardized technique during inhalational bronchoprovocation challenge testing. We investigated the effects of nebulizer model and dosimeter driving pressure on nebulizer output using a nebulized saline model. Four nebulizers (Hudson 1720, Salter 8900, Baxter Airlife, and DeVilbiss 644) were evaluated at two driving pressures (20 and 50 pounds per square inch [psi]) via a dosimeter (Salter 700) that delivered a 0.6-sec actuation. Output was determined gravimetrically after 20 actuations of saline at constant respiratory flow and volume. Output per actuation at 20 psi was 2.83 +/- 0.41 mg (mean +/- SD), 4.58 +/- 0.66, 4.75 +/- 0.42, and 4.75 +/- 1.37 for the Hudson, Salter, Baxter, and DeVilbiss, respectively, and 6.75 +/- 0.61 mg, 9.17 +/- 0.88, 9.42 +/- 1.32, and 9.83 +/- 1.75 at 50 psi. The Hudson delivered a lower volume than the other nebulizers (p < 0.0005). At 20 psi, output from the DeVilbiss had greater variability (coefficient of variation = 28.8%) compared to the Baxter (CV = 8.8%; p = 0.045). The output was greater at 50 psi than 20 psi for all models (p < 0.0005). These results demonstrate that, when choosing a nebulizer driven by a dosimeter, it is important to base that selection on published data describing aerosol output under different driving pressures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0894-2684 1941-2711 1557-9026 1941-2703 |
DOI: | 10.1089/08942680252908520 |