Tonometric Changes of Latanoprost-Induced Intraocular Pressure Reduction after Photorefractive Keratectomy
To assess whether tonometric measurements of the drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by 0.005% latanoprost are modified after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Data from 24 randomly selected eyes of 24 patients (12 men and 12 women, mean age +/- SD: 31.7 +/- 6.2 years) who were undergoing bi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2004-03, Vol.45 (3), p.846-850 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To assess whether tonometric measurements of the drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) induced by 0.005% latanoprost are modified after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Data from 24 randomly selected eyes of 24 patients (12 men and 12 women, mean age +/- SD: 31.7 +/- 6.2 years) who were undergoing bilateral PRK for myopia (-6.38 +/- 2.26 D) were obtained. Objective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior radius of corneal curvature (R), and IOP measurements at baseline and 24 hours after 1 drop of 0.005% latanoprost, were performed before and 6 months after PRK. All measured IOPs were recalculated by a correction factor for CCT and R and expressed as true IOP (IOPT) measurements.
The mean CCT +/- SD was 544.58 +/- 36.03 and 463.21 +/- 38.59 micro m, and the anterior radius of corneal curvature was 7.73 +/- 0.26 and 8.33 +/- 0.37 mm, before and after PRK, respectively. The mean IOP at baseline was 15.8 +/- 2.92 and 12.23 +/- 2.37 mm Hg, and after latanoprost administration was 12.54 +/- 1.97 and 10.19 +/- 1.47 mm Hg, before and after PRK, respectively. The mean IOPT at baseline was 15.46 +/- 1.08 and 16.18 +/- 2.31 mm Hg, and after latanoprost administration was 11.85 +/- 1.56 and 12.96 +/- 1.71 mm Hg, before and after PRK, respectively. The mean IOP and IOPT reductions after latanoprost administration were, respectively, 3.25 +/- 1.66 and 3.61 +/- 1.7 mm Hg before PRK, and 2.03 +/- 1.42 and 3.22 +/- 1.79 mm Hg after PRK. Pre- and postoperative IOP reduction significantly differed (P < 0.001), but not IOPT.
The effect of hypotensive drugs on IOP readings may be underestimated because of measurement errors due to CCT reduction and R increase after PRK for myopia. Misdiagnosis of reduced pharmacologic efficacy may be avoided if the measured IOP is corrected by a proper nomogram. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0146-0404 1552-5783 1552-5783 |
DOI: | 10.1167/iovs.03-0625 |