Endoscopic markers in adult coeliac disease

Background. Various endoscopic markers have been described in coeliac disease, particularly in the second part of the duodenum, with minor attention generally being paid to the duodenal bulb. Aims. To evaluate, prospectively, the presence of all endoscopic markers in the bulb and the second part of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2002-03, Vol.34 (3), p.177-182
Hauptverfasser: Brocchi, E., Tomassetti, P., Misitano, B., Epifanio, G., Corinaldesi, R., Bonvicini, F., Gasbarrini, G., Corazza, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Various endoscopic markers have been described in coeliac disease, particularly in the second part of the duodenum, with minor attention generally being paid to the duodenal bulb. Aims. To evaluate, prospectively, the presence of all endoscopic markers in the bulb and the second part of the duodenum on a large series of patients submitted to endoscopy for duodenal biopsy. Patients and Methods. A total of 367 consecutive patients, submitted to endoscopy with duodenal biopsy for various indications, were considered. Biopsies were graded as normal, with partial villous atrophy (mild, moderate, severe) or with subtotal villous atrophy. Endoscopic markers and corresponding locations evaluated were: micronodular pattern (bulb and descending duodenum), mosaic appearance (bulb and descending duodenum), scalloped folds (descending duodenum), reduced or absent folds (descending duodenum). Results. In 78 patients, a diagnosis of untreated coeliac disease was made. Endoscopic markers were seen in 73 78 patients, with only a single sign present (bulb or descending duodenum) in 12 patients. In the remaining 289 patients, normal histology and normal endoscopic findings were observed, except in two patients with reduced folds. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy regarding all endoscopic markers were 93.6%, 99.3%, 97.3%, 98.3% and 98.1 %, respectively. Conclusions. This study confirms the usefulness of endoscopic markers in detecting coeliac disease, underlining the importance of evaluating also abnormalities in the bulb and endoscopic single signs; although endoscopy may not detect all cases of coeliac disease, the recognition of endoscopic markers allows the selection for biopsy of unsuspected patients submitted to endoscopy for non-specific symptoms.
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80190-6